Literature DB >> 16679996

Accelerometer-determined physical activity of free-living college students.

Mary K Dinger1, Timothy K Behrens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to provide descriptive data of accelerometer-determined ambulatory physical activity in a sample of free-living college students and to examine college students' ambulatory physical activity patterns.
METHODS: All participants (245 females, age = 19.9 +/- 1.6 yr, body mass index (BMI) = 22.9 +/- 3.3 kg x m(-2); 209 males, age = 20.2 +/- 2.0 yr, BMI = 25.2 +/- 4.0 kg x m(-2)) wore an accelerometer for seven consecutive days. Accumulated physical activity (ct.d, ct x min(-1) x d(-1), and min x d(-1) spent at different intensities) and minutes per day spent in moderate or vigorous physical activity in sessions of at least 10 min were analyzed to describe the physical activity of the sample and examine physical activity patterns.
RESULTS: The entire sample accumulated 362,750.1 +/- 112,824.1 ct x d(-1) (males = 383,787.2 +/- 112,001.3 vs females = 344,804.1 +/- 110,619.5 ct x d(-1), P < 0.01) and 46.7 +/- 18.9 min x d(-1) in moderate physical activity (males = 51.7 +/- 19.8 vs females = 42.5 +/- 17.0 min x d(-1), P < 0.01). They were more active on weekdays than weekend days (P < 0.05), and they spent 13.6 +/- 12.7 min x d(-1) (males = 13.2 +/- 12.0 vs females = 13.8 +/- 13.3, P > 0.05) in moderate or vigorous physical activity sessions of at least 10 min.
CONCLUSION: Participants in this study accumulated a moderate amount of physical activity on most weekdays. Most participants, however, were not meeting the current moderate physical activity recommendation when moderate or vigorous physical activity sessions of at least 10 min were examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679996     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000210191.72081.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  13 in total

1.  Predicting Change in Physical Activity: a Longitudinal Investigation Among Weight-Concerned College Women.

Authors:  Danielle Arigo; Meghan L Butryn; Greer A Raggio; Eric Stice; Michael R Lowe
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  Influence of marriage and parenthood on physical activity: a 2-year prospective analysis.

Authors:  Ethan Edward Hull; Dana L Rofey; Robert J Robertson; Elizabeth F Nagle; Amy D Otto; Deborah J Aaron
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2010-09

3.  Objectively measured physical activity in urban alternative high school students.

Authors:  John R Sirard; Martha Y Kubik; Jayne A Fulkerson; Chrisa Arcan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  A comparison of two motion sensors for the assessment of free-living physical activity of adolescents.

Authors:  Roman Cuberek; Walid El Ansari; Karel Frömel; Krzysztof Skalik; Erik Sigmund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Reliability and validity of the multimedia activity recall in children and adults (MARCA) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Toby Hunt; Marie T Williams; Tim S Olds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Weekly physical activity patterns of university students: Are athletes more active than non-athletes?

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Fernando Manuel Lourenço Martins; Rui Sousa Mendes
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-18

7.  Patterns of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time: Are Nigerian health professional students complying with public health guidelines?

Authors:  Adewale L Oyeyemi; Suleiman Muhammed; Adetoyeje Y Oyeyemi; Babatunde O A Adegoke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of two different physical activity monitors.

Authors:  David R Paul; Matthew Kramer; Alanna J Moshfegh; David J Baer; William V Rumpler
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Area-level socioeconomic status, adiposity, physical activity, and inflammation in young adults, 2013.

Authors:  Michael V Fedewa; Bhibha M Das; Ronald L Forehand; Ellen M Evans
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Physical Activity Patterns in University Students: Do They Follow the Public Health Guidelines?

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Fernando Manuel Lourenço Martins; Rui Sousa Mendes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.