Literature DB >> 16679905

Comparing the Vancouver Scar Scale with the cutometer in the assessment of donor site wounds treated with various dressings in a randomized trial.

Hans-Oliver Rennekampff1, Jens Rabbels, Vonthein Reinhard, Stefan Thomas Becker, Hans-Eberhard Schaller.   

Abstract

Cutaneous scarring observed in wounds is, to a significant degree, dependent upon the time it takes for the wounds to heal. Various topical dressings are proposed to influence healing time in donor sites. In this prospective randomized study, we examined the effect of Vaseline gauze (VD; Branolind, Paul Hartmann AG, Germany), Biobrane (BD; Bertek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Morgantown, WV), an occlusive film dressing Barrier Flex (OD; Moelnlycke Health Care GmbH, Germany), and an equine collagen foil, Tissu Foil E (CD; Baxter, Heidelberg, Germany), on re-epithelialization and scarring in standardized donor site wounds. At 6 months after surgery, donor site scars and normal uninjured mirror sided skin were evaluated in 33 patients using both the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the cutometer SEM 575 (Courage and Khazaka). The median healing time for OD was 14 days, BD 16 days, CD 19 days, and VD 19 days. The single parameter pliability of the VSS was not significantly different from uninjured skin when all donor site scars were pooled. No difference was found between the four groups. Viscoelastic analysis of all pooled patient data showed a significant difference for Uf (total deformation), Ua (total recovery), Ur (immediate retraction), Ue (immediate distension), Ur/Ue, and Ur/Uf, indicating that donor sites significantly differed from normal uninjured skin. No significant correlation between objective viscoelastic measurements and the subjective pliability assessment of the VSS was found. Viscoelastic differences were greatest in the VD and BD groups. Viscolelastic differences did not significantly correlate with healing time. Various wound dressings had minimal yet significant influence on healing time and scarring. In contrast to the VSS, viscoelastic measurements of skin pliability can objectify scarring when few differences are anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679905     DOI: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000216311.61266.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  4 in total

1.  An evaluation of five different dressing materials on split-thickness skin graft donor site and full-thickness cutaneous wounds: an experimental study.

Authors:  Muhammet Uraloğlu; Murat Livaoğlu; Özgür Agdoğan; Sevdegül Mungan; Etem Alhan; Naci Karaçal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk® and Suprathel®-In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Janine Andreae; Paul Christian Fuchs; Rolf Lefering; Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger; Alexandra Schulz; Mahsa Bagheri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Influence of therapeutic ultrasound on the biomechanical characteristics of the skin.

Authors:  Lígia Brancalion Catapani; Adriana da Costa Gonçalves; Nathalia Morano Candeloro; Lídia Aparecida Rossi; Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-08-17

Review 4.  A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.

Authors:  Kwang Chear Lee; Janine Dretzke; Liam Grover; Ann Logan; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-04-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.