Literature DB >> 16679862

Endoscopic follow-up of 383 patients with colorectal adenoma: an observational study in daily practice.

Daisy Jonkers1, Justi Ernst, Ingrid Pladdet, Reinhold Stockbrügger, Wim Hameeteman.   

Abstract

Endoscopic removal of colorectal adenomas reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC), but follow-up surveillance is recommended. Compliance with the Dutch surveillance guidelines and detection of neoplasia during follow-up has been evaluated in daily practice. From 1987 to 1996, 383 consecutive patients with colorectal adenomas (56.4% male, 61.8+/-11.3 years) were included and followed until December 2000. The mean follow-up was 80.5+/-42.5 months with 2.2+/-0.9 follow-up endoscopies. A total of 32.5 and 27.3% of follow-up endoscopies were performed >25% (time between advised and actual endoscopy) too late or too early, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 33.4% of patients had left the follow-up (two-thirds died) and 60.1% were known with co-morbidity. A first, second, third, fourth and fifth follow-up endoscopy had been performed in 327, 238, 132, 64 and 35 patients, respectively. Adenomatous polyps (with high-risk polyps) were detected in 100% (42.6%) of the index endoscopies and in 25.1% (17.4%), 23.9% (10.5%), 28.0% (12.1%), 34.4% (25.0%) and 37.1% (17.1%) of the first to fifth follow-up endoscopy, respectively. CRC was diagnosed in seven patients (46.1+/-22.9 months after index endoscopy), resulting in a standardized incidence ratio of 1.4 (confidence interval 0.6-3.0, P=0.4) compared to the general population. In this daily practice, high numbers of total and high-risk adenomatous polyps were found during follow-up surveillance. The incidence of CRC was not significantly different from the general population, which might be due to the intensive follow-up and removal of polyps. These findings support the importance of follow-up surveillance. However, the high overall morbidity and mortality should be taken into account when selecting patients for an intensive follow-up programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16679862     DOI: 10.1097/01.cej.0000195710.56825.b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  3 in total

1.  Risk factors of nonadherence to colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy and its impact on clinical outcomes: a KASID multicenter study.

Authors:  Chung Hyun Tae; Chang Mo Moon; Seong-Eun Kim; Sung-Ae Jung; Chang Soo Eun; Jae Jun Park; Geom Seog Seo; Jae Myung Cha; Sung Chul Park; Jaeyoung Chun; Hyun Jung Lee; Yunho Jung; Jin Oh Kim; Young-Eun Joo; Dong Il Park
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Meta C J van Lanschot; Beatriz Carvalho; Veerle M H Coupé; Manon van Engeland; Evelien Dekker; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature.

Authors:  Sri Rapuri; Jeanne Spencer; Dennis Eckels
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.