Literature DB >> 16678867

Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation.

Kenneth Hugdahl1, Tormod Thomsen, Lars Ersland.   

Abstract

Following the theoretical framework of coordinate and categorical principals for visuo-spatial processing, originally formulated by [Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: AQ computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148-175], we present data from an fMRI study on mental rotation, using the classic [Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703] task, comparing males and females. Subjects were presented with black-and-white drawings of 3-D shapes taken from the set of 3-D perspective drawings developed by [Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703], alternated with 2-D white bars as control stimuli. The drawings were presented pairwise, as black and white drawings against a black circular background. On half of the trials, the two 3-D shapes were congruent but portrayed with different orientation, in the other half the two shapes were incongruent. Analysis of response accuracy and reaction times did not reveal any significant differences between the sexes. However, clusters of significant neuronal activation were found in the superior parietal lobule (BA 7), more intensely over the right hemisphere, and bilaterally in the inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45). Males showed predominantly parietal activation, while the females, in addition, showed inferior frontal activation. We suggest that males may be biased towards a coordinate processing approach, and females biased towards a serial, categorical processing approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678867     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  68 in total

1.  Mental paper folding performance following penetrating traumatic brain injury in combat veterans: a lesion mapping study.

Authors:  Leila Glass; Frank Krueger; Jeffrey Solomon; Vanessa Raymont; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Sex differences in visuospatial abilities persist during induced hypogonadism.

Authors:  Gioia M Guerrieri; Paul G Wakim; P A Keenan; Linda A Schenkel; Kate Berlin; Carolyn J Gibson; David R Rubinow; Peter J Schmidt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Early androgen effects on spatial and mechanical abilities: evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Sheri A Berenbaum; Kristina L Korman Bryk; Adriene M Beltz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Carsten Urbanek; Melanie Gross; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Simone Koehler; Michael Dettling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Explaining sex differences in mental rotation: role of spatial activity experience.

Authors:  Alina Nazareth; Asiel Herrera; Shannon M Pruden
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-05

6.  Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty.

Authors:  Camilo J Cela-Conde; Francisco J Ayala; Enric Munar; Fernando Maestú; Marcos Nadal; Miguel A Capó; David del Río; Juan J López-Ibor; Tomás Ortiz; Claudio Mirasso; Gisèle Marty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rena Li; Meharvan Singh
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 8.606

8.  Gender differences in healthy aging and Alzheimer's Dementia: A 18 F-FDG-PET study of brain and cognitive reserve.

Authors:  Maura Malpetti; Tommaso Ballarini; Luca Presotto; Valentina Garibotto; Marco Tettamanti; Daniela Perani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Brain functional differences in visuo-motor task adaptation between dominant and non-dominant hand training.

Authors:  Krystal M Kirby; Sreekrishna Ramakrishna Pillai; Owen T Carmichael; Arend W A Van Gemmert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cortical responses to self and others.

Authors:  Amra Hodzic; Lars Muckli; Wolf Singer; Aglaja Stirn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.