Literature DB >> 16678222

Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movement depend on the mode of execution.

Joachim Hermsdörfer1, Sophia Hentze, Georg Goldenberg.   

Abstract

Knowledge about the dependency of apraxic movements on the mode of execution may enhance the understanding of apraxia and of the cerebral representation of actions. We examined a common tool-use action in nine patients with left hemisphere damage and apraxia. Arm movements during the use of a handsaw were measured and tested in three different modes of execution: pantomime, pantomime with a bar shaped like the handle of the saw, and actual sawing. Analysis concentrated on spatial and kinematic features of the wrist trajectories during these repetitive movements. In healthy control subjects, both pantomime conditions differed from actual use mainly by larger amplitudes during miming. Apraxic patients executed large proportions of their pantomiming movements in an incorrect direction away from the appropriate anteroposterior direction, while other movement features were normal. The availability of the handle-like bar did not improve performance. During actual use, movement direction was constraint by mechanical demands. In this condition patients moved with moderately decreased velocity. However, this deficit was not related to the errors in movement direction characteristic of pantomiming. These data suggest that pantomiming and actual execution of an action are dictated by different external requirements and constraints, pantomiming serves to convey information, while actual use has to obey the mechanical demands of the task. Due to these differences, spatial and kinematic movement features in healthy subjects vary between the modes of execution, movements are differently vulnerable to apraxia, and deficits in patients may dissociate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678222     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  25 in total

1.  A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level.

Authors:  Gregory Króliczak; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Apraxia and Alzheimer's disease: review and perspectives.

Authors:  Mathieu Lesourd; Didier Le Gall; Josselin Baumard; Bernard Croisile; Christophe Jarry; François Osiurak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  The effect of aging and contextual information on manual asymmetry in tool use.

Authors:  Tea Lulic; Jacquelyn M Maciukiewicz; David A Gonzalez; Eric A Roy; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hand shape selection in pantomimed grasping: interaction between the dorsal and the ventral visual streams and convergence on the ventral premotor area.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Yoshiaki Someya; Seiji Ogawa; Yoshihiro Takayama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Tool use without a tool: kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Leif Johannsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): mechanics, space, time, and effort.

Authors:  François Osiurak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Conceptual- and production-related predictors of pantomimed tool use deficits in apraxia.

Authors:  S A Jax; D L Rosa-Leyra; L J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Diagnosis and treatment of upper limb apraxia.

Authors:  A Dovern; G R Fink; P H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Handmade task tracking applied to cognitive rehabilitation.

Authors:  José M Cogollor; Charmayne Hughes; Manuel Ferre; Javier Rojo; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Alan Wing; Sandra Campo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Perceiving what you intend to do from what you do: evidence for embodiment in social interactions.

Authors:  Francois Quesque; Yann Coello
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.