Literature DB >> 16678202

Protein refolding in silico with atom-based statistical potentials and conformational search using a simple genetic algorithm.

Qiaojun Fang1, David Shortle.   

Abstract

A distance-dependent atom-pair potential that treats long range and local interactions separately has been developed and optimized to distinguish native protein structures from sets of incorrect or decoy structures. Atoms are divided into 30 types based on chemical properties and relative position in the amino acid side-chains. Several parameters affecting the calculation and evaluation of this statistical potential, such as the reference state, the bin width, cutoff distances between pairs, and the number of residues separating the atom pairs, are adjusted to achieve the best discrimination. The native structure has the lowest energy for 39 of the 40 sets of original ROSETTA decoys (1000 structures per set) and 23 of the 25 improved decoys (approximately 1900 structures per set). Combined with the orientation-dependent backbone hydrogen bonding potential used by ROSETTA and a statistical solvation potential based on the solvent exclusion model of Lazaridis & Karplus, this potential is used as a scoring function for conformational search based on a genetic algorithm method. After unfolding the native structure by changing every phi and psi angle by either +/-3, +/-5 or +/-7 degrees, five small proteins can be efficiently refolded, in some cases to within 0.5 A C(alpha) distance matrix error (DME) to the native state. Although no significant correlation is found between the total energy and structural similarity to the native state, a surprisingly strong correlation exists between the radius of gyration and the DME for low energy structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678202     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  Reduced C(beta) statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification.

Authors:  James E Fitzgerald; Abhishek K Jha; Andres Colubri; Tobin R Sosnick; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  New statistical potential for quality assessment of protein models and a survey of energy functions.

Authors:  Dmitry Rykunov; Andras Fiser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Influence of proline on the thermostability of the active site and membrane arrangement of transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Alex Perálvarez-Marín; Victor A Lórenz-Fonfría; Rosana Simón-Vázquez; Maria Gomariz; Inmaculada Meseguer; Enric Querol; Esteve Padrós
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  DECK: Distance and environment-dependent, coarse-grained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Shiyong Liu; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Alternating evolutionary pressure in a genetic algorithm facilitates protein model selection.

Authors:  Marc N Offman; Alexander L Tournier; Paul A Bates
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-08-01

6.  Bhageerath-H: a homology/ab initio hybrid server for predicting tertiary structures of monomeric soluble proteins.

Authors:  B Jayaram; Priyanka Dhingra; Avinash Mishra; Rahul Kaushik; Goutam Mukherjee; Ankita Singh; Shashank Shekhar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Sorting protein decoys by machine-learning-to-rank.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Kai Wang; Ruqian Lu; Qiwen Dong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  MQAPRank: improved global protein model quality assessment by learning-to-rank.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Qiwen Dong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction.

Authors:  Mati Cohen; Vladimir Potapov; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.