Literature DB >> 16676346

A role of the mitotic spindle checkpoint in the cellular response to DNA replication stress.

Anette Duensing1, Xiaoyi Teng, Ying Liu, Michelle Tseng, Nicole Spardy, Stefan Duensing.   

Abstract

Replication stress is a frequent and early event during tumorigenesis. Whereas the cellular responses to a persistent block of replication fork progression have been extensively studied, relatively little is known about how cells respond to low-intensity replication stress. However, transient replication fork perturbations are likely to occur even more frequently in tumor cells than a permanent replication arrest. We report here that transient, low intensity replication stress leads to a rapid activation of the DNA replication checkpoint but to a significantly delayed apoptotic response in a small but significant number of cells. This late apoptotic response was independent of p53 and we found evidence for cell death during mitosis in a proportion of cells. To further explore the role of p53 in the response to replication stress, we analyzed mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) deficient of p53 in comparison to wild-type or p63- or p73-deficient MEFs. We detected a significant increase of apoptosis and morphological signs of failed mitosis such as multinucleation in p53-deficient MEFs following replication stress, but not in wild-type or p63- or p73-deficient cells. Multinucleated p53-deficient MEFs frequently retained cyclin B1 expression indicating a persistently activated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Collectively, our results suggest that the cellular response to replication stress involves the mitotic spindle checkpoint in a proportion of cells. These findings imply that the mitotic spindle checkpoint may act in concert with DNA damage and cell-cycle checkpoints as an early anti-tumor barrier and provide a possible explanation for its frequent relaxation in human cancer. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16676346      PMCID: PMC2225593          DOI: 10.1002/jcb.20962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  39 in total

Review 1.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53.

Authors:  R S Tibbetts; K M Brumbaugh; J M Williams; J N Sarkaria; W A Cliby; S Y Shieh; Y Taya; C Prives; R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Characterization of the p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint following spindle disruption.

Authors:  J S Lanni; T Jacks
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; D R Pilch; A H Orr; V S Ivanova; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-03-06       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Chk1 is essential for tumor cell viability following activation of the replication checkpoint.

Authors:  Song H Cho; Christian D Toouli; Gregory H Fujii; Chad Crain; David Parry
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  L L Parker; H Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Fission yeast genes involved in coupling mitosis to completion of DNA replication.

Authors:  T Enoch; A M Carr; P Nurse
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inhibition of histone deacetylases sensitizes glioblastoma cells to lomustine.

Authors:  Mikkel Staberg; Signe Regner Michaelsen; Rikke Darling Rasmussen; Mette Villingshøj; Hans Skovgaard Poulsen; Petra Hamerlik
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 2.  Myelodysplastic syndrome: an inability to appropriately respond to damaged DNA?

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Paul Hasty; Christi A Walter; Alexander J R Bishop; Linda M Scott; Vivienne I Rebel
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 3.  Potential relationship between inadequate response to DNA damage and development of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Peishuai Chen; Jian Gu; Alexander J R Bishop; Linda M Scott; Paul Hasty; Vivienne I Rebel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.