Literature DB >> 16674111

Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: Reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes.

Guanghui Wang1, Wells W Wu, Weihua Zeng, Chung-Lin Chou, Rong-Fong Shen.   

Abstract

A critical step in protein biomarker discovery is the ability to contrast proteomes, a process referred generally as quantitative proteomics. While stable-isotope labeling (e.g., ICAT, 18O- or 15N-labeling, or AQUA) remains the core technology used in mass spectrometry-based proteomic quantification, increasing efforts have been directed to the label-free approach that relies on direct comparison of peptide peak areas between LC-MS runs. This latter approach is attractive to investigators for its simplicity as well as cost effectiveness. In the present study, the reproducibility and linearity of using a label-free approach to highly complex proteomes were evaluated. Various amounts of proteins from different proteomes were subjected to repeated LC-MS analyses using an ion trap or Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Highly reproducible data were obtained between replicated runs, as evidenced by nearly ideal Pearson's correlation coefficients (for ion's peak areas or retention time) and average peak area ratios. In general, more than 50% and nearly 90% of the peptide ion ratios deviated less than 10% and 20%, respectively, from the average in duplicate runs. In addition, the multiplicity ratios of the amounts of proteins used correlated nicely with the observed averaged ratios of peak areas calculated from detected peptides. Furthermore, the removal of abundant proteins from the samples led to an improvement in reproducibility and linearity. A computer program has been written to automate the processing of data sets from experiments with groups of multiple samples for statistical analysis. Algorithms for outlier-resistant mean estimation and for adjusting statistical significance threshold in multiplicity of testing were incorporated to minimize the rate of false positives. The program was applied to quantify changes in proteomes of parental and p53-deficient HCT-116 human cells and found to yield reproducible results. Overall, this study demonstrates an alternative approach that allows global quantification of differentially expressed proteins in complex proteomes. The utility of this method to biomarker discovery is likely to synergize with future improvements in the detecting sensitivity of mass spectrometers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16674111     DOI: 10.1021/pr050406g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  93 in total

1.  Extending the dynamic range of label-free mass spectrometric quantification of affinity purifications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Bildl; Alexander Haupt; Catrin S Müller; Martin L Biniossek; Jörg Oliver Thumfart; Björn Hüber; Bernd Fakler; Uwe Schulte
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  The application of mass-spectrometry-based protein biomarker discovery to theragnostics.

Authors:  Jonathan M Street; James W Dear
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate MudPIT samples.

Authors:  Bret Cooper; Jian Feng; Wesley M Garrett
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Proteomic profiling of a layered tissue reveals unique glycolytic specializations of photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  Boris Reidel; J Will Thompson; Sina Farsiu; M Arthur Moseley; Nikolai P Skiba; Vadim Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Accurate peptide fragment mass analysis: multiplexed peptide identification and quantification.

Authors:  Chad R Weisbrod; Jimmy K Eng; Michael R Hoopmann; Tahmina Baker; James E Bruce
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  Modern instrumental methods in forensic toxicology.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Shawn P Vorce; Justin M Holler; Eric Shimomura; Joe Magluilo; Aaron J Jacobs; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 7.  Methods and approaches for the comprehensive characterization and quantification of cellular proteomes using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Shama P Mirza; Michael Olivier
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  Characterization of the cardiac succinylome and its role in ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Jennifer A Boylston; Junhui Sun; Yong Chen; Marjan Gucek; Michael N Sack; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.000

9.  A straightforward and highly efficient precipitation/on-pellet digestion procedure coupled with a long gradient nano-LC separation and Orbitrap mass spectrometry for label-free expression profiling of the swine heart mitochondrial proteome.

Authors:  Xiaotao Duan; Rebeccah Young; Robert M Straubinger; Brian Page; Jin Cao; Hao Wang; Haoying Yu; John M Canty; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Evaluation of the variation in sample preparation for comparative proteomics using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture.

Authors:  Guoan Zhang; David Fenyö; Thomas A Neubert
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.