Literature DB >> 16672877

Modular femoral offset stems facilitate joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty.

Ormonde M Mahoney1, Tracy L Kinsey.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Restoration of proper joint line position in revision total knee arthroplasty is essential in promoting recovery of function. We retrospectively analyzed joint line restoration and clinical outcomes in 22 consecutive femur revision cases using modular offsets of variable length and direction between the intramedullary fixation rod and the femoral component. Flexion and extension gap balancing techniques and medial epicondylar referencing was used to achieve proper position of the joint line. Position of the reconstructed joint line from postoperative radiographs was compared to the baseline position of intended anatomic placement determined from pre-operative planning radiographs. Postoperative joint line height averaged 1.6 mm distal to baseline (range, 5 mm distal to 2.5 proximal). Joint line was restored to within 2 mm of anatomic position in 12 of the 22 knees. Sixteen patients received conventional, minimally constrained tibial inserts, and joint stability was achieved in all cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series). See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672877     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214425.44582.6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Computer-assisted revision of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aymard de Ladoucette
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A useful radiologic method for preoperative joint-line determination in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jose Romero; Burkhardt Seifert; Olaf Reinhardt; Oliver Ziegler; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Bieganowski; Daniel B Buchalter; Vivek Singh; John J Mercuri; Vinay K Aggarwal; Joshua C Rozell; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  5- to 9-year survivorship of single-radius, posterior-stabilized TKA.

Authors:  Ormonde M Mahoney; Tracy L Kinsey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A technique of predicting radiographic joint line and posterior femoral condylar offset of the knee.

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; David F Hamilton; Richard Burnett
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2014-02-11

8.  Joint line and patellar height restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Ozkurt; T Sen; D Cankaya; S Kendir; K Basarır; Y Tabak
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  TIBIAL COMPONENT IN REVISION OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: COMPARISON BETWEEN CEMENTED AND HYBRID FIXATION.

Authors:  Francisco Fontes Cintra; Anthony Kerbes Yepéz; Marcos Gilbert Sucena Rasga; Marcelo Abagge; Paulo Gilberto Cimbalista Alencar
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.