Heidi Aase1, Terje Sagvolden. 1. Norwegian Center for Studies of Conduct Problems and Innovative Practice, UNIRAND Ltd, University of Oslo, Norway. heidi.aa@atferd.unirand.no
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The underlying behavioral/psychological processes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are unclear. Motivational factors, related to dopamine dysfunction, may play an important role in the development of the behavioral symptoms. Particularly, infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers have been suggested to be associated with altered responding and deviant behavior in children with ADHD. The present study was designed to analyze the influence of reinforcement frequency on operationalized measures of hyperactivity, impulsiveness, sustained attention, and response variability. METHODS: Fifty-six boys, half of whom were diagnosed with ADHD, completed a computerized task presented as a game with two squares on the screen. One square was associated with reinforcement. The task required responses by the computer mouse under contingencies alternating between variable interval schedules of short (mean 2 s) and long (mean 20 s) durations. Reinforcers were cartoon pictures and small trinkets. RESULTS: Overall, there was no difference between children with ADHD and comparison children when reinforcers were given frequently. Statistically significant differences on measures of sustained attention and variability, but not hyperactivity and impulsiveness, were found during infrequent reinforcement only. Age effects interacted with group effects on sustained attention, showing that group differences were found in the young children only. Surprisingly, older comparison children showed increased response variability and no learning. CONCLUSIONS: When reinforcers are infrequent, children with ADHD show deficient sustained attention and increased variability in responding. Computer experience may have interfered with measures of hyperactivity and impulsiveness. The unexpectedly poor performance of the older comparison children may have been due to inefficient reinforcers or to verbally governed behavior overruling reinforcer effects. Reinforcer characteristics and experimental procedures are important factors influencing findings in studies investigating motivational factors. The study provides some support for the dynamic developmental theory of ADHD predicting relationships between neurobiological deficits, altered reinforcement mechanisms, and treatment recommendations.
BACKGROUND: The underlying behavioral/psychological processes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are unclear. Motivational factors, related to dopamine dysfunction, may play an important role in the development of the behavioral symptoms. Particularly, infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers have been suggested to be associated with altered responding and deviant behavior in children with ADHD. The present study was designed to analyze the influence of reinforcement frequency on operationalized measures of hyperactivity, impulsiveness, sustained attention, and response variability. METHODS: Fifty-six boys, half of whom were diagnosed with ADHD, completed a computerized task presented as a game with two squares on the screen. One square was associated with reinforcement. The task required responses by the computer mouse under contingencies alternating between variable interval schedules of short (mean 2 s) and long (mean 20 s) durations. Reinforcers were cartoon pictures and small trinkets. RESULTS: Overall, there was no difference between children with ADHD and comparison children when reinforcers were given frequently. Statistically significant differences on measures of sustained attention and variability, but not hyperactivity and impulsiveness, were found during infrequent reinforcement only. Age effects interacted with group effects on sustained attention, showing that group differences were found in the young children only. Surprisingly, older comparison children showed increased response variability and no learning. CONCLUSIONS: When reinforcers are infrequent, children with ADHD show deficient sustained attention and increased variability in responding. Computer experience may have interfered with measures of hyperactivity and impulsiveness. The unexpectedly poor performance of the older comparison children may have been due to inefficient reinforcers or to verbally governed behavior overruling reinforcer effects. Reinforcer characteristics and experimental procedures are important factors influencing findings in studies investigating motivational factors. The study provides some support for the dynamic developmental theory of ADHD predicting relationships between neurobiological deficits, altered reinforcement mechanisms, and treatment recommendations.
Authors: Loren J Sobel; Ravi Bansal; Tiago V Maia; Juan Sanchez; Luigi Mazzone; Kathleen Durkin; Jun Liu; Xuejun Hao; Iliyan Ivanov; Ann Miller; Laurence L Greenhill; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sarah V Spencer; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2009-08
Authors: Terje Sagvolden; Espen Borgå Johansen; Grete Wøien; S Ivar Walaas; Jon Storm-Mathisen; Linda Hildegard Bergersen; Oivind Hvalby; Vidar Jensen; Heidi Aase; Vivienne A Russell; Peter R Killeen; Tania Dasbanerjee; Frank A Middleton; Stephen V Faraone Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Roxann C Harvey; Chloe J Jordan; David H Tassin; Kayla R Moody; Linda P Dwoskin; Kathleen M Kantak Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Jan R Wiersema; Jacob J van der Meere; Herbert Roeyers Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 7.444