Literature DB >> 16671929

Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Heidi Aase1, Terje Sagvolden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The underlying behavioral/psychological processes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are unclear. Motivational factors, related to dopamine dysfunction, may play an important role in the development of the behavioral symptoms. Particularly, infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers have been suggested to be associated with altered responding and deviant behavior in children with ADHD. The present study was designed to analyze the influence of reinforcement frequency on operationalized measures of hyperactivity, impulsiveness, sustained attention, and response variability.
METHODS: Fifty-six boys, half of whom were diagnosed with ADHD, completed a computerized task presented as a game with two squares on the screen. One square was associated with reinforcement. The task required responses by the computer mouse under contingencies alternating between variable interval schedules of short (mean 2 s) and long (mean 20 s) durations. Reinforcers were cartoon pictures and small trinkets.
RESULTS: Overall, there was no difference between children with ADHD and comparison children when reinforcers were given frequently. Statistically significant differences on measures of sustained attention and variability, but not hyperactivity and impulsiveness, were found during infrequent reinforcement only. Age effects interacted with group effects on sustained attention, showing that group differences were found in the young children only. Surprisingly, older comparison children showed increased response variability and no learning.
CONCLUSIONS: When reinforcers are infrequent, children with ADHD show deficient sustained attention and increased variability in responding. Computer experience may have interfered with measures of hyperactivity and impulsiveness. The unexpectedly poor performance of the older comparison children may have been due to inefficient reinforcers or to verbally governed behavior overruling reinforcer effects. Reinforcer characteristics and experimental procedures are important factors influencing findings in studies investigating motivational factors. The study provides some support for the dynamic developmental theory of ADHD predicting relationships between neurobiological deficits, altered reinforcement mechanisms, and treatment recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16671929     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01468.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0021-9630            Impact factor:   8.982


  27 in total

1.  Response requirement and increases in accuracy produced by stimulant drugs in a 5-choice serial reaction-time task in rats.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Jonathan L Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Basal ganglia surface morphology and the effects of stimulant medications in youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Loren J Sobel; Ravi Bansal; Tiago V Maia; Juan Sanchez; Luigi Mazzone; Kathleen Durkin; Jun Liu; Xuejun Hao; Iliyan Ivanov; Ann Miller; Laurence L Greenhill; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Impulsiveness, overactivity, and poorer sustained attention improve by chronic treatment with low doses of l-amphetamine in an animal model of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Terje Sagvolden
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.759

4.  Examining relationships between executive functioning and delay aversion in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Sarah L Karalunas; Cynthia L Huang-Pollock
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2011

5.  Stimulant treatment reduces lapses in attention among children with ADHD: the effects of methylphenidate on intra-individual response time distributions.

Authors:  Sarah V Spencer; Larry W Hawk; Jerry B Richards; Keri Shiels; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-08

6.  Intraindividual variability (IIV) in an animal model of ADHD - the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat.

Authors:  Guy M L Perry; Terje Sagvolden; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 7.  The spontaneously hypertensive rat model of ADHD--the importance of selecting the appropriate reference strain.

Authors:  Terje Sagvolden; Espen Borgå Johansen; Grete Wøien; S Ivar Walaas; Jon Storm-Mathisen; Linda Hildegard Bergersen; Oivind Hvalby; Vidar Jensen; Heidi Aase; Vivienne A Russell; Peter R Killeen; Tania Dasbanerjee; Frank A Middleton; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Performance on a strategy set shifting task during adolescence in a genetic model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate vs. atomoxetine treatments.

Authors:  Roxann C Harvey; Chloe J Jordan; David H Tassin; Kayla R Moody; Linda P Dwoskin; Kathleen M Kantak
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Context-dependent dynamic processes in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: differentiating common and unique effects of state regulation deficits and delay aversion.

Authors:  Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Jan R Wiersema; Jacob J van der Meere; Herbert Roeyers
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 10.  Reinforcement, dopamine and rodent models in drug development for ADHD.

Authors:  Gail Tripp; Jeff Wickens
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.