Literature DB >> 16671861

Revisiting inhibitory control across the life span: insights from the ex-Gaussian distribution.

Tara McAuley1, Melvin Yap, Shawn E Christ, Desirée A White.   

Abstract

Changes in inhibitory control occur across the life span and have been associated with alterations in prefrontal function. In this study, ex-Gaussian analysis was used to reexamine data from an inhibitory control task. Participants (ages 6 to 82 years) composed three groups: children, young adults, and older adults. In fitting the ex-Gaussian distribution to reaction time data, estimates of three parameters were obtained: mu (mu), reflecting average performance; sigma (sigma), reflecting variability in performance; and tau (tau), reflecting extremes in performance. Older adults differed from young adults in terms of mu, sigma, and tau. For children, mu and tau values were comparable to those of young adults; sigma, however, was different. Thus, inhibitory changes in older adults were due to slower, more variable, and more extreme responding. Inhibitory changes in children were due only to more variable responding. These findings suggest that different mechanisms underlie age-related changes in inhibitory control during different epochs of the life span. This study demonstrates that the ex-Gaussian approach provides a finer level of analysis than data analytic approaches typically used in neuropsychological research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16671861     DOI: 10.1207/s15326942dn2903_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1532-6942            Impact factor:   2.253


  22 in total

1.  Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks.

Authors:  Chi-Shing Tse; David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Janet M Duchek; David P McCabe
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Shannon Robertson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Reaction time variability in ADHD: a review.

Authors:  Leanne Tamm; Megan E Narad; Tanya N Antonini; Kathleen M O'Brien; Larry W Hawk; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Detecting age differences in resistance to perceptual and motor interference.

Authors:  J Richard Jennings; David N Mendelson; Mark S Redfern; Robert D Nebes
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Variability of Reaction Time as a Marker of Executive Function Impairments in Fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Stefan Duschek; Cristina Muñoz Ladrón de Guevara; María José Fernández Serrano; Casandra I Montoro; Santiago Pelegrina López; Gustavo A Reyes Del Paso
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.112

6.  Does experience in talking facilitate speech repetition?

Authors:  Linda I Shuster; Donna R Moore; Gang Chen; Dennis M Ruscello; William F Wonderlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Aerobic fitness and intra-individual variability of neurocognition in preadolescent children.

Authors:  Robert Davis Moore; Chien-Ting Wu; Matthew B Pontifex; Kevin C O'Leary; Mark R Scudder; Lauren B Raine; Christopher R Johnson; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Jitter Reduces Response-Time Variability in ADHD: An Ex-Gaussian Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan W Y Lee; Lisa A Jacobson; Alison E Pritchard; Matthew S Ryan; Qilu Yu; Martha B Denckla; Stewart Mostofsky; E Mark Mahone
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.256

9.  Aging and error processing: age related increase in the variability of the error-negativity is not accompanied by increase in response variability.

Authors:  Sven Hoffmann; Michael Falkenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominika Dykiert; Geoff Der; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.