Literature DB >> 21424956

Detecting age differences in resistance to perceptual and motor interference.

J Richard Jennings1, David N Mendelson, Mark S Redfern, Robert D Nebes.   

Abstract

The authors asked whether different forms of inhibition are altered differently by aging using a Motor and Perceptual Inhibition Test (MAPIT) based on Nassauer and Halperin (Nassauer & Halperin, 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 25-30). Ninety-eight individuals participating in studies of balance and attention were separated into younger (mean age 25 years) and older (mean age 73) participants. Older participants showed less perceptual and motor inhibition than younger participants, with moderation of this effect by gender, that is, motor inhibition appeared to decline more sharply with age in women than in men. The two scores were uncorrelated in the young but significantly correlated in the older group. Overall, the MAPIT appeared to yield reliable measures of two aspects of inhibition that demonstrate a differential impact of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21424956      PMCID: PMC3064447          DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.554512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  17 in total

1.  Further considerations regarding inhibitory processes, working memory, and cognitive aging.

Authors:  J D Grant; D Dagenbach
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2000

2.  Inhibitory control across the life span.

Authors:  S E Christ; D A White; T Mandernach; B A Keys
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibition processes through the use of novel computerized conflict tasks.

Authors:  Katharine W Nassauer; Jeffrey M Halperin
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Are perceptual and motor inhibition processes really dissociated? A comment on Nassauer and Halperin (2003).

Authors:  Raymond Bruyer
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Li; Ulman Lindenberger; Bernhard Hommel; Gisa Aschersleben; Wolfgang Prinz; Paul B Baltes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

6.  The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis.

Authors:  Naomi P Friedman; Akira Miyake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-03

Review 7.  Inhibition in attention and aging.

Authors:  J M McDowd
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging.

Authors:  M J Kane; L Hasher; E R Stoltzfus; R T Zacks; S L Connelly
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1994-03

9.  Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention.

Authors:  A F Kramer; D G Humphrey; J F Larish; G D Logan; D L Strayer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1994-12

10.  Inhibitory processes relate differently to balance/reaction time dual tasks in young and older adults.

Authors:  David N Mendelson; Mark S Redfern; Robert D Nebes; J Richard Jennings
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-06-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Perceptual inhibition is associated with sensory integration in standing postural control among older adults.

Authors:  Mark S Redfern; J Richard Jennings; David Mendelson; Robert D Nebes
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Postural adjustment errors reveal deficits in inhibition during lateral step initiation in older adults.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Susan I Fuhrman; Mark S Redfern; J Richard Jennings; Subashan Perera; Robert D Nebes; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Postural adjustment errors during lateral step initiation in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Susan I Fuhrman; Mark S Redfern; Subashan Perera; J Richard Jennings; Alia A Alghwiri; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Measurement of brain activation during an upright stepping reaction task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Theodore Huppert; Benjamin Schmidt; Nancy Beluk; Joseph Furman; Patrick Sparto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Erratum to: postural adjustment errors during lateral step initiation in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Susan I Fuhrman; Mark S Redfern; Subashan Perera; J Richard Jennings; Alia A Alghwiri; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Safety, tolerability, and clinical effect of low-dose buprenorphine for treatment-resistant depression in midlife and older adults.

Authors:  Jordan F Karp; Meryl A Butters; Amy E Begley; Mark D Miller; Eric J Lenze; Daniel M Blumberger; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Selective Age Effects on Visual Attention and Motor Attention during a Cued Saccade Task.

Authors:  Wendy E Huddleston; Brad E Ernest; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Activation, Inhibition, or Something Else: An Exploratory Study on Response Priming Using Moving Dots as Primes in Middle-Aged and Old Adults.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Cathleen Kappes
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2018-06-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.