Literature DB >> 16669378

Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing.

H C Amstutz1, M J Le Duff.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing is not a new concept and attempts to treat hip arthritis without resecting the femoral head and neck have been made since the 1950s. The resurgence of new and better-engineered metal-on-metal bearings has provided the means to develop a viable prosthetic solution from a concept that was once abandoned. The lessons drawn from the early resurfacing era led to modern designs all using a cementless fixation of the acetabular component and a short metaphyseal stem designed for component alignment on the femoral side. Currently, only metallic devices can be manufactured with sufficient strength as a thin one-piece shell, combining excellent wear properties for large femoral heads and a bone-conserving device on the acetabular side. The early results of these new designs are extremely encouraging but the rapid development of the procedure needs to be controlled by appropriate training programmes to ensure its future success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16669378     DOI: 10.1243/095441105X69088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  10 in total

Review 1.  Metallic debris from metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty regulates periprosthetic tissues.

Authors:  Christoph H Lohmann; Gurpal Singh; Hans-Georg Willert; Gottfried H Buchhorn
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

2.  Do ion levels in hip resurfacing differ from metal-on-metal THA at midterm?

Authors:  A Moroni; L Savarino; M Hoque; M Cadossi; N Baldini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips.

Authors:  Pat Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Scott Nelson; Karren Takamura; Koen De Smet; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Biomechanical aspects of the implant fixation and kinematics of hip resurfacing systems].

Authors:  R Bader; D Klüss; L Gerdesmeyer; E Steinhauser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Does femoral neck to cup impingement affect metal ion levels in hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Andrew J Wassef; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hip resurfacing: a 40-year perspective.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-14

7.  Do ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing differ from those in metal-on-metal THA at long-term followup?

Authors:  Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Eugenio Chiarello; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  How do metal ion levels change over time in hip resurfacing patients? A cohort study.

Authors:  Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Eugenio Chiarello; Caterina Fotia; Michelina Greco; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-14

9.  The histological and elemental characterisation of corrosion particles from taper junctions.

Authors:  S Munir; R A Oliver; B Zicat; W L Walter; W K Walter; W R Walsh
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Acetabular Debonding: An Investigation of Porous Coating Delamination in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Dani Gaillard-Campbell; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-11-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.