Literature DB >> 16668423

Small light-harvesting antenna does not protect from photoinhibition.

E Tyystjärvi1, A Koivuniemi, R Kettunen, E M Aro.   

Abstract

High-light-induced decrease in photosystem II (PSII) electron transfer activity was studied in high- and low-light-grown pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) plants in vivo and in vitro. The PSII light-harvesting antenna of the low-light leaves was estimated to be twice as big as that of the high-light leaves. The low-light leaves were more susceptible to photoinhibition in vivo. However, thylakoids isolated from these two plant materials were equally sensitive to photoinhibition when illuminated in the absence of external electron acceptors. Only the intensity of the photoinhibitory light and the chlorophyll concentration of the sample, not the size of the light-harvesting antenna, determined the rate of PSII photoinhibition in vitro. Because excitation of the reaction center and not only the antenna chlorophylls is a prerequisite for photoinhibition of PSII activity, independence of photoinhibition on antenna size provides support for the hypothesis (Schatz EH, Brock H, Holzwarth AR [1988] Biophys J 54: 397-405) that the excitations of the antenna chlorophylls are in equilibrium with the excitations of the reaction centers. Better tolerance of the high-light leaves in vivo was due to a more active repair process and more powerful protective mechanisms, including photosynthesis. Apparently, some protective mechanism of the high-light-grown plants is at least partially active at low temperature. The protective mechanisms do not appear to function in vitro.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 16668423      PMCID: PMC1081031          DOI: 10.1104/pp.97.2.477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  8 in total

1.  COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS.

Authors:  D I Arnon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1949-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  The Susceptibility of Photosynthesis to Photoinhibition and the Capacity of Recovery in High and Low Light Grown Cyanobacteria, Anacystis nidulans.

Authors:  G Samuelsson; A Lönneborg; P Gustafsson; G Oquist
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  The Nature of Light-Induced Inhibition of Photosystem II in Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) Leaves Depends on Temperature.

Authors:  E Tyystjärvi; J Ovaska; P Karunen; E M Aro
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Kinetic and Energetic Model for the Primary Processes in Photosystem II.

Authors:  G H Schatz; H Brock; A R Holzwarth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Distribution of Chlorophyll-Protein Complexes during Chilling in the Light Compared with Heat-Induced Modifications.

Authors:  J Ovaska; P Mäenpää; A Nurmi; E M Aro
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Inactive Photosystem II Complexes in Leaves : Turnover Rate and Quantitation.

Authors:  R A Chylla; J Whitmarsh
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Fractionation of Thylakoid Membranes with the Nonionic Detergent Octyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside: RESOLUTION OF CHLOROPHYLL-PROTEIN COMPLEX II INTO TWO CHLOROPHYLL-PROTEIN COMPLEXES.

Authors:  E L Camm; B R Green
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Zeaxanthin Synthesis, Energy Dissipation, and Photoprotection of Photosystem II at Chilling Temperatures.

Authors:  B Demmig-Adams; K Winter; A Krüger; F C Czygan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.340

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity.

Authors:  E Tyystjärvi; E M Aro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Slow degradation of the d1 protein is related to the susceptibility of low-light-grown pumpkin plants to photoinhibition.

Authors:  E Tyystjärvi; K Ali-Yrkkö; R Kettunen; E M Aro
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Photoinhibition and D1 Protein Degradation in Peas Acclimated to Different Growth Irradiances.

Authors:  E. M. Aro; S. McCaffery; J. M. Anderson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Photosystem II Excitation Pressure and Development of Resistance to Photoinhibition (II. Adjustment of Photosynthetic Capacity in Winter Wheat and Winter Rye).

Authors:  G. R. Gray; L. V. Savitch; A. G. Ivanov; NPA. Huner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  In search of a reversible stage of photoinhibition in a higher plant: No changes in the amount of functional Photosystem II accompany relaxation of variable fluorescence after exposure of lincomycin-treated Cucurbita pepo leaves to high light.

Authors:  D V Vavilin; E Tyystjärvi; E M Aro
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Photosynthesis rates, growth, and ginsenoside contents of 2-yr-old Panax ginseng grown at different light transmission rates in a greenhouse.

Authors:  In-Bae Jang; Dae-Young Lee; Jin Yu; Hong-Woo Park; Hwang-Sung Mo; Kee-Choon Park; Dong-Yun Hyun; Eung-Ho Lee; Kee-Hong Kim; Chang-Sik Oh
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.060

7.  Variations in chloroplast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence among chloroplast division mutants under light stress.

Authors:  Siddhartha Dutta; Jeffrey A Cruz; Saif M Imran; Jin Chen; David M Kramer; Katherine W Osteryoung
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.992

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.