Literature DB >> 12231982

Photoinhibition and D1 Protein Degradation in Peas Acclimated to Different Growth Irradiances.

E. M. Aro1, S. McCaffery, J. M. Anderson.   

Abstract

The relationship between the susceptibility of photosystem II (PSII) to photoinhibition in vivo and the rate of degradation of the D1 protein of the PSII reaction center heterodimer was investigated in leaves from pea plants (Pisum sativum L. cv Greenfeast) grown under widely contrasting irradiances. There was an inverse linear relationship between the extent of photoinhibition and chlorophyll (Chl) a/b ratios, with low-light leaves being more susceptible to high light. In the presence of the chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis inhibitor lincomycin, the differential sensitivity of the various light-acclimated pea leaves to photoinhibition was largely removed, demonstrating the importance of D1 protein turnover as the most crucial mechanism to protect against photoinhibition. In the differently light-acclimated pea leaves, the rate of D1 protein degradation (measured from [35S]methionine pulse-chase experiments) increased with increasing incident light intensities only if the light was not high enough to cause photoinhibition in vivo. Under moderate illumination, the rate constant for D1 protein degradation corresponded to the rate constant for photoinhibition in the presence of lincomycin, demonstrating a balance between photodamage to D1 protein and subsequent recovery, via D1 protein degradation, de novo synthesis of precursor D1 protein, and reassembly of functional PSII. In marked contrast, in light sufficiently high to cause photoinhibition in vivo, the rate of D1 protein degradation no longer increased concomitantly with increasing photoinhibition, suggesting that the rate of D1 protein degradation is playing a regulatory role. The extent of thylakoid stacking, indicated by the Chl a/b ratios of the differently light-acclimated pea leaves, was linearly related to the half-life of the D1 protein in strong light. We conclude that photoinhibition in vivo occurs under conditions in which the rate of D1 protein degradation can no longer be enhanced to rapidly remove irreversibly damaged D1 protein. We suggest that low-light pea leaves, with more stacked membranes and less stroma-exposed thylakoids, are more susceptible to photoinhibition in vivo mainly due to their slower rate of D1 protein degradation under sustained high light and their slower repair cycle of the photodamaged PSII centers.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 12231982      PMCID: PMC159054          DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.3.835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  14 in total

1.  Synthesis of the early light-inducible protein is controlled by blue light and related to light stress.

Authors:  I Adamska; I Ohad; K Kloppstech
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Slow degradation of the d1 protein is related to the susceptibility of low-light-grown pumpkin plants to photoinhibition.

Authors:  E Tyystjärvi; K Ali-Yrkkö; R Kettunen; E M Aro
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Small light-harvesting antenna does not protect from photoinhibition.

Authors:  E Tyystjärvi; A Koivuniemi; R Kettunen; E M Aro
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Light-induced D1 protein degradation is catalyzed by a serine-type protease.

Authors:  I Virgin; A H Salter; D F Ghanotakis; B Andersson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1991-08-05       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Light-dependent D1 protein synthesis and translocation is regulated by reaction center II. Reaction center II serves as an acceptor for the D1 precursor.

Authors:  N Adir; S Shochat; I Ohad
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Intramembrane translocation and posttranslational palmitoylation of the chloroplast 32-kDa herbicide-binding protein.

Authors:  A K Mattoo; M Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Turnover of thylakoid photosystem II proteins during photoinhibition of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  G Schuster; R Timberg; I Ohad
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1988-11-01

Review 8.  Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover.

Authors:  E M Aro; I Virgin; B Andersson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1993-07-05

9.  Isolation of a photosystem II reaction center consisting of D-1 and D-2 polypeptides and cytochrome b-559.

Authors:  O Nanba; K Satoh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Light-induced spectral absorbance changes in relation to photosynthesis and the epoxidation state of xanthophyll cycle components in cotton leaves.

Authors:  W Bilger; O Björkman; S S Thayer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  86 in total

1.  Effects of solar ultraviolet radiation on the potential efficiency of photosystem II in leaves of tropical plants

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  The rate constant of photoinhibition, measured in lincomycin-treated leaves, is directly proportional to light intensity.

Authors:  E Tyystjärvi; E M Aro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Photosystem II reaction center damage and repair cycle: chloroplast acclimation strategy to irradiance stress.

Authors:  C Vasilikiotis; A Melis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Biochemical and molecular studies on declining and decline-resistant spruce in the north-east of France.

Authors:  Frédérique Weber-Lotfi; Pierre Guillemaut; Rémy Poirey; Monique Schmitz; André Dietrich
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The short-term response of Arabidopsis thaliana (C3) and Zea mays (C4) chloroplasts to red and far red light.

Authors:  Maksymilian Zienkiewicz; Anna Drożak; Wioleta Wasilewska; Ilona Bacławska; Ewa Przedpełska-Wąsowicz; Elżbieta Romanowska
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Leaf discs floated on water are different from intact leaves in photosynthesis and photoinhibition.

Authors:  Masaharu C Kato; Kouki Hikosaka; Tadaki Hirose
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  A simple chlorophyll fluorescence parameter that correlates with the rate coefficient of photoinactivation of photosystem II.

Authors:  Luke Hendrickson; Britta Förster; Barry J Pogson; Wah Soon Chow
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A mechanism of nonphotochemical energy dissipation, independent from PsbS, revealed by a conformational change in the antenna protein CP26.

Authors:  Luca Dall'Osto; Stefano Caffarri; Roberto Bassi
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Genome-wide gene expression analysis reveals a critical role for CRYPTOCHROME1 in the response of Arabidopsis to high irradiance.

Authors:  Tatjana Kleine; Peter Kindgren; Catherine Benedict; Luke Hendrickson; Asa Strand
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Photosystem II Excitation Pressure and Development of Resistance to Photoinhibition (II. Adjustment of Photosynthetic Capacity in Winter Wheat and Winter Rye).

Authors:  G. R. Gray; L. V. Savitch; A. G. Ivanov; NPA. Huner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.