Literature DB >> 16665289

Involvement of Carrot Cell Surface Proteins in Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

R H Gurlitz1, P W Lamb, A G Matthysse.   

Abstract

The initial step in tumor formation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the site-specific attachment of the bacteria to plant cells. A similar attachment to plant tissue culture cells has been observed. Binding to carrot suspension culture cells was not dependent on the presence of divalent cations and was not inhibited by the addition of mannose, alpha-methyl mannoside, galactose, arabinose, glucosamine, 2-deoxyglucose, or 0.25 molar NaCl to the culture medium. The ability of the carrot cells to bind A. tumefaciens was markedly reduced by elution of the cells with dilute detergent or CaCl(2) or by incubation of the cells with proteolytic enzymes. The carrot cells were not killed by these treatments and recovered the ability to bind A. tumefaciens within 3 to 6 hours. A. tumefaciens did not bind to carrot cells which had been induced to form embryos (AG Matthysse, RHG Gurlitz 1982 Physiol Plant Pathol 21: 381-387). A comparison of the peptides eluted from embryos and from uninduced cells using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that there were several changes in extractable polypeptides after embryo induction. One or more of the polypeptides present before embryo induction and absent from embryos may be involved in the binding of A. tumefaciens to the carrot cell surface.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16665289      PMCID: PMC1056405          DOI: 10.1104/pp.83.3.564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  15 in total

1.  Phytochrome in cultured wild carrot tissue. I. Synthesis.

Authors:  D F Wetherell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Ultrasensitive stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels shows regional variation in cerebrospinal fluid proteins.

Authors:  C R Merril; D Goldman; S A Sedman; M H Ebert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Interaction of a hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein from tobacco callus with potential pathogens.

Authors:  J E Mellon; J P Helgeson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Purification and Characterization of a Salt-extractable Hydroxyproline-rich Glycoprotein from Aerated Carrot Discs.

Authors:  D A Stuart; J E Varner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens Interaction with Suspension-Cultured Tomato Cells.

Authors:  N T Neff; A N Binns
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  In Vitro Binding of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Plant Cells from Suspension Culture.

Authors:  K Ohyama; L E Pelcher; A Schaefer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells.

Authors:  C J Douglas; W Halperin; E W Nester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Elaboration of cellulose fibrils by Agrobacterium tumefaciens during attachment to carrot cells.

Authors:  A G Matthysse; K V Holmes; R H Gurlitz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection.

Authors:  A G Matthysse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Hemagglutination by purified type I Escherichia coli pili.

Authors:  I E Salit; E C Gotschlich
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  11 in total

1.  Attachment of agrobacteria to grape cells.

Authors:  X A Pu; R N Goodman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A survey of the pectic content of nonlignified monocot cell walls.

Authors:  M C Jarvis; W Forsyth; H J Duncan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Agrobacterium in the genomics age.

Authors:  Stanton B Gelvin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Potential of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Octopine-Utilizing Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains To Attach to Susceptible Potato Tissues.

Authors:  J W Chan; W D Ramey; L W Moore; C R Bell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effect of Plasmid pSa and of Auxin on Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Carrot Cells.

Authors:  A G Matthysse
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Differences in susceptibility of Arabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration.

Authors:  J Nam; A G Matthysse; S B Gelvin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  Competence of Immature Maize Embryos for Agrobacterium-Mediated Gene Transfer.

Authors:  M. Schlappi; B. Hohn
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to carrot cells and Arabidopsis wound sites is correlated with the presence of a cell-associated, acidic polysaccharide.

Authors:  B L Reuhs; J S Kim; A G Matthysse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Transformation of Wall Deficient Cultured Tobacco Protoplasts by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  A N Binns
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Involvement of a vitronectin-like protein in attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to carrot suspension culture cells.

Authors:  V T Wagner; A G Matthysse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.