Literature DB >> 16664024

Agrobacterium tumefaciens Interaction with Suspension-Cultured Tomato Cells.

N T Neff1, A N Binns.   

Abstract

Adherence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to suspension-cultured tomato cells has been characterized using a quantitative binding assay. Saturable binding of radiolabeled A. tumefaciens to plant cells resulted in 100 to 300 bacteria bound per cell. Specificity of A. tumefaciens binding was also inferred from two additional results: (a) an initial incubation of plant cells with A. tumefaciens reduced subsequent binding of radiolabeled A. tumefaciens by 60% to 75%; (b) tomato cells bound less than three E. coli per cell. Protease treatment of plant cells had no effect on subsequent bacterial binding, but prior treatment of plant cells with pectinolytic enzymes increased binding 2- to 3-fold. Pectin-enriched and neutral polymer-enriched fractions were obtained from tomato cell walls. The soluble pectin-enriched fraction inhibited binding of bacteria to plant cells by 85% to 95%, whereas the neutral polymer fraction only partially inhibited binding. Preliminary characterization of the activity showed it is heat stable, partially inactivated by protease treatment, and substantially inactivated by acid hydrolysis.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 16664024      PMCID: PMC1064452          DOI: 10.1104/pp.77.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  12 in total

1.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  In Vitro Binding of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Plant Cells from Suspension Culture.

Authors:  K Ohyama; L E Pelcher; A Schaefer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  The specific nature of plant cell wall polysaccharides.

Authors:  D J Nevins; P D English; P Albersheim
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Tumor induction by agrobacterium involves attachment of the bacterium to a site on the host plant cell wall.

Authors:  B B Lippincott; M H Whatley; J A Lippincott
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  T-DNA of the Agrobacterium Ti and Ri plasmids.

Authors:  M W Bevan; M D Chilton
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells.

Authors:  C J Douglas; W Halperin; E W Nester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Plasmid-dependent attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant tissue culture cells.

Authors:  A G Matthysse; P M Wyman; K V Holmes
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Bacterial attachment to a specific wound site as an essential stage in tumor initiation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  B B Lippincott; J A Lippincott
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Introduction of genetic material into plant cells.

Authors:  A Caplan; L Herrera-Estrella; D Inzé; E Van Haute; M Van Montagu; J Schell; P Zambryski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cell walls of crown-gall tumors and embryonic plant tissues lack agrobacterium adherence sites.

Authors:  J A Lippincott; B B Lippincott
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  18 in total

1.  Attachment of agrobacteria to grape cells.

Authors:  X A Pu; R N Goodman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Agrobacterium in the genomics age.

Authors:  Stanton B Gelvin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Role of vitronectin-like protein in Agrobacterium attachment and transformation of Arabidopsis cells.

Authors:  Hélène Clauce-Coupel; Sophie Chateau; Corinne Ducrocq; Vincent Niot; Srini Kaveri; Frédéric Dubois; Brigitte Sangwan-Norreel; Rajbir S Sangwan
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Potential of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Octopine-Utilizing Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains To Attach to Susceptible Potato Tissues.

Authors:  J W Chan; W D Ramey; L W Moore; C R Bell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Differences in susceptibility of Arabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration.

Authors:  J Nam; A G Matthysse; S B Gelvin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Variation in Binding and Virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Chromosomal Virulence (chv) Mutant Bacteria on Different Plant Species.

Authors:  M C Hawes; S G Pueppke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Differential effects of elicitors on the viability of rice suspension cells.

Authors:  C Masuta; M Van den Bulcke; G Bauw; M Van Montagu; A B Caplan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Reexamining the role of the accessory plasmid pAtC58 in the virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58.

Authors:  Gauri R Nair; Zhenying Liu; Andrew N Binns
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens B6 and A. radiobacter K84 to Tomato Root Tips.

Authors:  R Penalver; M T Serra; N Duran-Vila; M M Lopez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Involvement of a vitronectin-like protein in attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to carrot suspension culture cells.

Authors:  V T Wagner; A G Matthysse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.