Literature DB >> 16664551

Interspecific Variation in SO(2) Flux : Leaf Surface versus Internal Flux, and Components of Leaf Conductance.

D M Olszyk1, D T Tingey.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to clarify the relationships among stomatal, residual, and epidermal conductances in determining the flux of SO(2) air pollution to leaves. Variations in leaf SO(2) and H(2)O vapor fluxes were determined using four plant species: Pisum sativum L. (garden pea), Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. flacca (mutant of tomato), Geranium carolinianum L. (wild geranium), and Diplacus aurantiacus (Curtis) Jeps. (a native California shrub). Fluxes were measured using the mass-balance approach during exposure to 4.56 micromoles per cubic meter (0.11 microliters per liter) SO(2) for 2 hours in a controlled environmental chamber. Flux through adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces with closed stomata ranged from 1.9 to 9.4 nanomoles per square meter per second for SO(2), and 0.3 to 1.3 millimoles per square meter per second for H(2)O vapor. Flux of SO(2) into leaves through stomata ranged from approximately 0 to 8.5 (dark) and 3.8 to 16.0 (light) millimoles per square meter per second. Flux of H(2)O vapor from leaves through stomata ranged from approximately 0 to 0.6 (dark) to 0.4 to 0.9 (light) millimole per square meter per second. Lycopersicon had internal flux rates for both SO(2) and H(2)O vapor over twice as high as for the other species. Stomatal conductance based on H(2)O vapor flux averaged from 0.07 to 0.13 mole per square meter per second among the four species. Internal conductance of SO(2) as calculated from SO(2) flux was from 0.04 mole per square meter per second lower to 0.06 mole per square meter per second higher than stomatal conductance. For Pisum, Geranium, and Diplacus stomatal conductance was the same or slightly higher than internal conductance, indicating that, in general, SO(2) flux could be predicted from stomatal conductance for H(2)O vapor. However, for the Lycopersicon mutant, internal leaf conductance was much higher than stomatal conductance, indicating that factors inside leaves can play a significant role in determining SO(2) flux.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 16664551      PMCID: PMC1075005          DOI: 10.1104/pp.79.4.949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  6 in total

1.  Mechanisms of resistance to sulfur dioxide in the Cucurbitaceae.

Authors:  R A Bressan; L G Wilson; P Filner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Stomatal Response and Leaf Injury of Pisum sativum L. with SO(2) and O(3) Exposures : I. INFLUENCE OF POLLUTANT LEVEL AND LEAF MATURITY.

Authors:  D M Olszyk; T W Tibbitts
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Phenotypic reversion of flacca, a wilty mutant of tomato, by abscisic Acid.

Authors:  D Imber; M Tal
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Phytotoxicity of Air Pollutants: Evidence for the Photodetoxification of SO(2) but Not O(3).

Authors:  D M Olszyk; D T Tingey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Sulfur Dioxide Flux into Leaves of Geranium carolinianum L. : Evidence for a Nonstomatal or Residual Resistance.

Authors:  G E Taylor; D T Tingey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Stomatal Conductance and Sulfur Uptake of Five Clones of Populus tremuloides Exposed to Sulfur Dioxide.

Authors:  T W Kimmerer; T T Kozlowski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 8.340

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Mesophyll Resistances to SO(2) Fluxes into Leaves.

Authors:  H Pfanz; E Martinoia; O L Lange; U Heber
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Joint Action of O(3) and SO(2) in Modifying Plant Gas Exchange.

Authors:  D M Olszyk; D T Tingey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Flux of SO(2) into Leaf Cells and Cellular Acidification by SO(2).

Authors:  H Pfanz; E Martinoia; O L Lange; U Heber
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Sulfur-dioxide fluxes into different cellular compartments of leaves photosynthesizing in a polluted atmosphere : II. Consequences of SO2 uptake as revealed by computer analysis.

Authors:  A Laisk; H Pfanz; U Heber
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.116

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.