Literature DB >> 16662968

Sulfur Dioxide Flux into Leaves of Geranium carolinianum L. : Evidence for a Nonstomatal or Residual Resistance.

G E Taylor1, D T Tingey.   

Abstract

The concurrent exchange of SO(2) and H(2)O vapor between the atmosphere and foliage of Geranium carolinianum was investigated using a whole-plant gas exchange chamber. Total leaf flux of SO(2) was partitioned into leaf surface and internal fractions. The emission rate of SO(2)-induced H(2)S was measured to develop a net leaf budget for atmospherically derived sulfur. Stomatal resistance to SO(2) flux was estimated by two techniques: (a) R(s) (SO(2)') from SO(2) data using analog modeling techniques and (b) R(s) (SO(2) ) from analogy to H(2)O (i.e. 1.89 R(s) (H(2)o)).The emission of H(2)S was positively correlated with the rate of SO(2) flux into the leaf interior. An accounting of the simultaneous, bidirectional flux of gaseous sulfur compounds during pollutant exposure showed that sulfur accumulation in the leaf interior of G. carolinianum was 7 to 15% lower than that estimated solely from mass-balance calculations of SO(2) flux data (i.e. ignoring H(2)S emissions).The esimate of stomatal resistance to pollutant flux from the SO(2) data (R(s) (SO(2)')) was consistently less than the simultaneous estimate derived from analogy to H(2)O vapor (R(s) (SO(2) )). The resultant of R(s) (SO(2)') - R(s) (SO(2) ), which was always negative, is indicative of a residual resistance to SO(2) flux into the leaf interior. On a comparative basis, SO(2) molecules experienced less pathway resistance to diffusion than effluxing H(2)O molecules. It is proposed that the SO(2):H(2)O path length ratio is less than unity, as a consequence of the pollutant's high water solubility and unique chemical reactivity in solution. Thus, the diffusive paths for H(2)O and SO(2) in G. carolinianum are not completely synonymous.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16662968      PMCID: PMC1066202          DOI: 10.1104/pp.72.1.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  11 in total

1.  On the Resistance to Transpiration of the Sites of Evaporation within the Leaf.

Authors:  G D Farquhar; K Raschke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Relative humidity: important modifier of pollutant uptake by plants.

Authors:  S B McLaughlin; G E Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Exchange of SO2 between the atmosphere and natural waters.

Authors:  P S Liss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Vegetation: a sink for atmospheric pollutants.

Authors:  A C Hill
Journal:  J Air Pollut Control Assoc       Date:  1971-06

5.  Uptake of sulphur dioxide by barley leaves at low sulphur dioxide concentrations.

Authors:  D J Spedding
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  [Microscopical studies on spruce leaves exposed to SO2].

Authors:  D Grill; O Härtel
Journal:  Mikroskopie       Date:  1969

7.  Methyl viologen-linked sulfite reductase from spinach leaves.

Authors:  K Asada; G Tamura; R S Bandurski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1969-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Stimulation of h(2)s emission from pumpkin leaves by inhibition of glutathione synthesis.

Authors:  H Rennenberg; P Filner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Stomatal Conductance and Sulfur Uptake of Five Clones of Populus tremuloides Exposed to Sulfur Dioxide.

Authors:  T W Kimmerer; T T Kozlowski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Light-dependent Emission of Hydrogen Sulfide from Plants.

Authors:  L G Wilson; R A Bressan; P Filner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mesophyll Resistances to SO(2) Fluxes into Leaves.

Authors:  H Pfanz; E Martinoia; O L Lange; U Heber
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Emission of volatile sulfur compounds from spruce trees.

Authors:  H Rennenberg; B Huber; P Schröder; K Stahl; W Haunold; H W Georgii; S Slovik; H Pfanz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Stomatal patchiness in Mediterranean evergreen sclerophylls : Phenomenology and consequences for the interpretation of the midday depression in photosynthesis and transpiration.

Authors:  W Beyschlag; H Pfanz; R J Ryel
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Fate and distribution of sulfur-35 in yellow poplar and red maple trees.

Authors:  C T Garten
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Photosynthesis, carbon allocation, and growth of sulfur dioxide ecotypes ofGeranium carolinianum L.

Authors:  G E Taylor; D T Tingey; C A Gunderson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Interspecific Variation in SO(2) Flux : Leaf Surface versus Internal Flux, and Components of Leaf Conductance.

Authors:  D M Olszyk; D T Tingey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Direct Observation of Reversible and Irreversible Stomatal Responses of Attached Sunflower Leaves to SO(2).

Authors:  K Omasa; Y Hashimoto; P J Kramer; B R Strain; I Aiga; J Kondo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Buffer capacities of leaves, leaf cells, and leaf cell organelles in relation to fluxes of potentially acidic gases.

Authors:  H Pfanz; U Heber
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Phytotoxicity of Air Pollutants: Evidence for the Photodetoxification of SO(2) but Not O(3).

Authors:  D M Olszyk; D T Tingey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Light and the maintenance of photosynthetic competence in leaves of Populus balsamifera L. during short-term exposures to high concentrations of sulfur dioxide.

Authors:  W W Adams; K Winter; A Lanzl
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.