Literature DB >> 16535413

Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens B6 and A. radiobacter K84 to Tomato Root Tips.

R Penalver, M T Serra, N Duran-Vila, M M Lopez.   

Abstract

Agrobacterium tumefaciens B6 and the avirulent Agrobacterium radiobacter strain K84 attached to in vitro-cultured tomato root tips, but the binding of strain B6 to root tips was greater than the binding of strain K84. Strain K84 was not able to block the attachment of A. tumefaciens B6 to in vitro-cultured tomato root tips.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID： 16535413      PMCID： PMC1388951          DOI： 10.1128/aem.62.9.3530-3534.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN： 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  9 in total

1.  Attachment of agrobacteria to grape cells.

Authors:  X A Pu; R N Goodman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Potential of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Octopine-Utilizing Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains To Attach to Susceptible Potato Tissues.

Authors:  J W Chan; W D Ramey; L W Moore; C R Bell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evidence of Biological Control of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strains Sensitive and Resistant to Agrocin 84 by Different Agrobacterium radiobacter Strains on Stone Fruit Trees.

Authors:  M M López; M T Gorris; C I Salcedo; A M Montojo; M Miró
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Biological Control of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Colonization, and pAgK84 Transfer with Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 and the Tra Mutant Strain K1026.

Authors:  B Vicedo; R Peñalver; M J Asins; M M López
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens Interaction with Suspension-Cultured Tomato Cells.

Authors:  N T Neff; A N Binns
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  In Vitro Binding of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Plant Cells from Suspension Culture.

Authors:  K Ohyama; L E Pelcher; A Schaefer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells.

Authors:  C J Douglas; W Halperin; E W Nester
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Plasmid-dependent attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant tissue culture cells.

Authors:  A G Matthysse; P M Wyman; K V Holmes
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Bacterial attachment to a specific wound site as an essential stage in tumor initiation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  B B Lippincott; J A Lippincott
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 3.490
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Cocolonization of the rhizosphere by pathogenic agrobacterium strains and nonpathogenic strains K84 and K1026, used for crown gall biocontrol

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Expression of nitrite and nitric oxide reductases in free-living and plant-associated Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 cells.

Authors:  Seung-Hun Baek; James P Shapleigh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Role for Rhizobium rhizogenes K84 cell envelope polysaccharides in surface interactions.

Authors:  Ana M Abarca-Grau; Lindsey P Burbank; Héctor D de Paz; Juan C Crespo-Rivas; Ester Marco-Noales; María M López; Jose M Vinardell; Susanne B von Bodman; Ramón Penyalver
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Lipopeptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain 32a as promising biocontrol compounds against the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  Dorra Ben Abdallah; Slim Tounsi; Houda Gharsallah; Adnane Hammami; Olfa Frikha-Gargouri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.223
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.