Literature DB >> 16662098

Comparative studies on the sodium, potassium, and chloride relations of a wild halophytic and a domestic salt-sensitive tomato species.

D W Rush1, E Epstein.   

Abstract

In long-term experiments with differentially salinized nutrient solutions, plants of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill cv. Walter failed at Na(+) concentrations of 200 millimolar or more but tolerated K(+) concentrations of that magnitude. The behavior of the wild, salt-tolerant Lycopersicon cheesmanii (Hook) C. H. Mull., accession number 1401, was diametrically different; it tolerated Na(+) at 200 millimolar, but K(+) at the same concentration proved toxic to it.Short-term comparative studies on the absorption and translocation of Na(+), K(+), and Cl(-) of the two species were carried out using radioactive tracers with excised roots and whole plants. These studies showed that, under high salt conditions (50-100 millimolar NaCl), the tolerant 1401 freely accumulated Na(+) in the shoot, while the salt-sensitive cultivar excluded it from the leaves, where it has been shown to be toxic.In experiments where K(+) was limiting, the salt-tolerant species could partially substitute Na(+) for K(+). Sodium stimulated growth even when K(+) was present at adequate concentrations. The domestic cultivar could not substitute Na(+) for K(+) and showed no similar growth stimulation when Na(+) was added in the presence of adequate K(+). The salt-tolerant 1401 was more efficient in K(+) absorption than was the domestic cultivar at both low and moderate ambient K(+) concentrations.The two species differed little in their chloride relations.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16662098      PMCID: PMC426093          DOI: 10.1104/pp.68.6.1308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  2 in total

1.  Responses of Atriplex spongiosa and Suaeda monoica to Salinity.

Authors:  R Storey; R G Jones
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Genotypic Responses to Salinity: Differences between Salt-sensitive and Salt-tolerant Genotypes of the Tomato.

Authors:  D W Rush; E Epstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 8.340

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Molecular cloning and sequence of cDNA encoding the plasma membrane proton pump (H+-ATPase) of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  J F Harper; T K Surowy; M R Sussman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sodium Transport and Compartmentation in Spergularia marina: Partial Characterization of a Functional Symplasm.

Authors:  D Lazof; J M Cheeseman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Salt sensitivity in wheat : a case for specific ion toxicity.

Authors:  R W Kingsbury; E Epstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Potassium and sodium absorption kinetics in roots of two tomato species : lycopersicon esculentum and lycopersicon cheesmanii.

Authors:  A F Wrona; E Epstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Potassium transport in two tomato species : lycopersicon esculentum and lycopersicon cheesmanii.

Authors:  A F Wrona; E Epstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Diverse Traits Contribute to Salinity Tolerance of Wild Tomato Seedlings from the Galapagos Islands.

Authors:  Yveline Pailles; Mariam Awlia; Magdalena Julkowska; Luca Passone; Khadija Zemmouri; Sónia Negrão; Sandra M Schmöckel; Mark Tester
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  A novel and conserved salt-induced protein is an important determinant of salt tolerance in yeast.

Authors:  R Gaxiola; I F de Larrinoa; J M Villalba; R Serrano
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  A comparison of hydroponic and soil-based screening methods to identify salt tolerance in the field in barley.

Authors:  Ehsan Tavakkoli; Foad Fatehi; Pichu Rengasamy; Glenn K McDonald
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.992

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.