Literature DB >> 16659442

Genotypic Responses to Salinity: Differences between Salt-sensitive and Salt-tolerant Genotypes of the Tomato.

D W Rush1, E Epstein.   

Abstract

Four ecotypes of the species Lycopersicon cheesmanii ssp. minor (Hook.) C.H. Mull. from the Galapagos Islands were compared with L. esculentum Mill cv. VF 36 with respect to salt tolerance. The L. cheesmanii ecotype that proved most salt-tolerant was selected for detailed comparison with the L. esculentum cultivar. Plants were grown in modified Hoagland solution salinized with synthetic seawater salt mix. Growth rates under saline conditions were examined and amino acid, sugar, total amino nitrogen, free acidity, and Na and K levels in the tissues of the most and least tolerant plants were measured under salt stress and nonstress conditions. Results indicate that all Galapagos ecotypes were far more salt-tolerant than was the esculentum cultivar. They could survive in full strength seawater nutrient solution while the esculentum cultivar could not in most cases withstand levels higher than 50% seawater. Growth rates were reduced in both species under saline conditions but the esculentum cultivar was more severely affected. High levels of total amino nitrogen, specific amino acids, and free acidity along with low sodium content were found in the salt stressed VF 36 cultivar. The opposite responses were noted in the salt stressed treatments of the Galapagos ecotype. Tissue sugar levels did not appear to be similarly correlated with salt stress in either species. Potassium content fell sharply during salinization in the Galapagos ecotype while in the esculentum cultivar it declined relatively little even at high levels of salinity.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16659442      PMCID: PMC541983          DOI: 10.1104/pp.57.2.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  15 in total

1.  Differential mRNA transcription during salinity stress in barley.

Authors:  S Ramagopal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Salinity stress induced tissue-specific proteins in barley seedlings.

Authors:  S Ramagopal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Inositol and sugars in adaptation of tomato to salt.

Authors:  R F Sacher; R C Staples
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Diversity of salt tolerance in a germplasm collection of wheat (Triticum spp.).

Authors:  H I Sayed
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Potassium and sodium absorption kinetics in roots of two tomato species : lycopersicon esculentum and lycopersicon cheesmanii.

Authors:  A F Wrona; E Epstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Comparative studies on the sodium, potassium, and chloride relations of a wild halophytic and a domestic salt-sensitive tomato species.

Authors:  D W Rush; E Epstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Uptake and distribution of sodium and potassium by corn seedlings : I. Role of the mesocotyl in ;sodium exclusion'.

Authors:  J G Johanson; J M Cheeseman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Effect of salinity on tomato fruit ripening.

Authors:  Y Mizrahi
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Identification of fruit yield loci controlling the salt tolerance conferred by solanum rootstocks.

Authors:  M T Estañ; I Villalta; M C Bolarín; E A Carbonell; M J Asins
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Diverse Traits Contribute to Salinity Tolerance of Wild Tomato Seedlings from the Galapagos Islands.

Authors:  Yveline Pailles; Mariam Awlia; Magdalena Julkowska; Luca Passone; Khadija Zemmouri; Sónia Negrão; Sandra M Schmöckel; Mark Tester
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.