Literature DB >> 16661294

An apparent anomaly in peanut leaf conductance.

J E Pallas1.   

Abstract

Conductance to gaseous transfer is normally considered to be greater from the abaxial than from the adaxial side of a leaf. Measurements of the conductance to water vapor of peanut leaves (Arachis hypogaea L.) under well watered and stress conditions in a controlled environment, however, indicated a 2-fold higher conductance from the adaxial side of the leaf than from the abaxial. Studies of conductance as light level was varied showed an increase in conductance from either surface with increasing light level, but conductance was always greater from the adaxial surface at any given light level. In contrast, measurements of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) and snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaf conductance showed an approximate 2-fold greater conductance from the abaxial surface than from the adaxial. Approximately the same number of stomata were present on both peanut leaf surfaces and stomatal size was similar. Electron microscopic examination of peanut leaves did not reveal any major structural differences between stomata on the two surfaces that would account for the differences in conductance. Light microscope studies of leaf sections revealed an extensive network of bundle sheaths with achloraplastic bundle sheath extensions; the lower epidermis was lined with a single layer of large achloraplastic parenchyma cells. Measurements of net photosynthesis made on upper and lower leaf surfaces collectively and individually indicated that two-thirds of the peanut leaf's total net photosynthesis can be attributed to diffusion of CO(2) through the adaxial leaf surface. Possibly the high photosynthetic efficiency of peanut cultivars as compared with certain other C(3) species is associated with the greater conductance of CO(2) through their upper leaf surfaces.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 16661294      PMCID: PMC440436          DOI: 10.1104/pp.65.5.848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  5 in total

1.  Leaf diffusion resistance, illuminance, and transpiration.

Authors:  W L Ehrler; C H van Bavel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. I. Influence of leaf-water potential.

Authors:  E T Kanemasu; C B Tanner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Design calibration and field use of a stomatal diffusion porometer.

Authors:  E T Kanemasu; G W Thurtell; C B Tanner
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Abscisic Acid Content, Transpiration, and Stomatal Conductance As Related to Leaf Age in Plants of Xanthium strumarium L.

Authors:  K Raschke; J A Zeevaart
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Water Potential and Stomatal Resistance of Sunflower and Soybean Subjected to Water Stress during Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  N Sionit; P J Kramer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 8.340

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  The response of foliar gas exchange to exogenously applied ethylene.

Authors:  G E Taylor; C A Gunderson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Inhibition of photosynthesis by ethylene-a stomatal effect.

Authors:  J E Pallas; S J Kays
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Measurement of CO(2) and H(2)O Vapor Exchange in Spinach Leaf Discs : Effects of Orthophosphate.

Authors:  G C Harris; J K Cheesbrough; D A Walker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 8.340

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.