Literature DB >> 1665682

Refinement of the relative alkylation index (RAI) model for skin sensitization and application to mouse and guinea-pig test data for alkyl alkanesulphonates.

D W Roberts1, R Fraginals, J P Lepoittevin, C Benezra.   

Abstract

A derivation, more rigorous than hitherto, of the Relative Alkylation Index (RAI) as a quantifier of carrier protein haptenation in skin sensitization tests is presented. It is shown that the RAI, which is a composite parameter made up of dose, reactivity and lipophilicity terms, is likely to require a higher weighting for the reactivity term in the case of non-adjuvant tests than in the case of Freund's adjuvant-based tests. Methyl alkane-sulphonates, RSO3Me with R ranging from n-C6H13 to n-C16H33, were found to be skin sensitizers in a mouse ear swelling test, in agreement with published findings in a guinea-pig adjuvant model. A structure-activity relationship consistent with the published RAI model was observed whereby, in tests at fixed molar induction (0.1 mM) and challenge concentrations (0.025 mM), the level of sensitization response at first increased with increasing chain length of R, then showed a reversal of this trend at the highest chain length (R = n-C16H33). That this is a genuine 'over-load effect', as reported for several other series of compounds examined in guinea-pig adjuvant models, is indicated by the finding that on reducing the induction concentration for the R = n-C16H33 compound the sensitization response was increased. Alkyl and alkenyl methane-sulphonates, MeSO3R (R = n-C12H25, n-C18H37 and R = oleyl) did not give significant sensitization in the mouse ear test. Although they are chemically less reactive than methyl alkanesulphonates, these compounds are reported to be strong sensitizers in guinea-pig adjuvant tests and to fit a common quantitative sensitization-structure-dose relationship with the methyl alkanesulphonates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1665682     DOI: 10.1007/bf00371821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res        ISSN: 0340-3696            Impact factor:   3.017


  8 in total

1.  A quantitative structure activity/dose response relationship for contact allergic potential of alkyl group transfer agents.

Authors:  D W Roberts; D A Basketter
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  The derivation of quantitative correlations between skin sensitisation and physio-chemical parameters for alkylating agents, and their application to experimental data for sultones.

Authors:  D W Roberts; D L Williams
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1982-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 3.  Suppressive mechanisms involving sensitization and tolerance in contact allergy.

Authors:  H N Claman; S D Miller; M S Sy; J W Moorhead
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 12.988

4.  Correlations between skin sensitization potential and chemical reactivity for p-nitrobenzyl compounds.

Authors:  D W Roberts; B F Goodwin; D L Williams; K Jones; A W Johnson; J C Alderson
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential of diacrylates and dimethacrylates.

Authors:  D W Roberts
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Methyl groups as antigenic determinants in skin sensitisation.

Authors:  D W Roberts; B F Goodwin; D Basketter
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST).

Authors:  S C Gad; B J Dunn; D W Dobbs; C Reilly; R D Walsh
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Sensitizing capacity of three methyl alkanesulphonates: a murine in vivo and in vitro model of allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  R Fraginals; J P Lepoittevin; C Benezra
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.017

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  4D-fingerprint categorical QSAR models for skin sensitization based on the classification of local lymph node assay measures.

Authors:  Yi Li; Yufeng J Tseng; Dahua Pan; Jianzhong Liu; Petra S Kern; G Frank Gerberick; Anton J Hopfinger
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Predictive molecular and genetic toxicology. Application to the detection of sensitizing potential of xenobiotics.

Authors:  J L Garrigue; P Catroux; J Leclaire
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Ernst Ahlberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Sol Bobst; David Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Sarah Campbell; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Tatyana Doktorova; Thomas Exner; David Faulkner; Ian M Fearon; Markus Fehr; Shayne C Gad; Véronique Gervais; Amanda Giddings; Susanne Glowienke; Barry Hardy; Catrin Hasselgren; Jedd Hillegass; Robert Jolly; Eckart Krupp; Liat Lomnitski; Jason Magby; Jordi Mestres; Lawrence Milchak; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Rahul Parakhia; Alexis Parenty; Patricia Parris; Alexandre Paulino; Ana Theresa Paulino; David W Roberts; Harald Schlecker; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodrigez; David T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Daniel Urbisch; Anna Vuorinen; Brian Wall; Thibaud Weiler; Angela T White; Jessica Whritenour; Joerg Wichard; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 4.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.