Literature DB >> 16652207

Protein Alpha Shape (PAS) Dock: a new gaussian-based score function suitable for docking in homology modelled protein structures.

Kristin Tøndel1, Endre Anderssen, Finn Drabløs.   

Abstract

Protein Alpha Shape (PAS) Dock is a new empirical score function suitable for virtual library screening using homology modelled protein structures. Here, the score function is used in combination with the geometry search method Tabu search. A description of the protein binding site is generated using gaussian property fields like in Protein Alpha Shape Similarity Analysis (PASSA). Gaussian property fields are also used to describe the ligand properties. The overlap between the receptor and ligand hydrophilicity and lipophilicity fields is maximised, while minimising steric clashes. Gaussian functions introduce a smoothing of the property fields. This makes the score function robust against small structural variations, and therefore suitable for use with homology models. This also makes it less critical to include protein flexibility in the docking calculations. We use a fast and simplified version of the score function in the geometry search, while a more detailed version is used for the final prediction of the binding free energies. This use of a two-level scoring makes PAS-Dock computationally efficient, and well suited for virtual screening. The PAS-Dock score function is trained on 218 X-ray structures of protein- ligand complexes with experimental binding affinities. The performance of PAS-Dock is compared to two other docking methods, AutoDock and MOE-Dock, with respect to both accuracy and computational efficiency. According to this study, PAS-Dock is more computationally efficient than both AutoDock and MOE-Dock, and gives a better prediction of the free energies of binding. PAS-Dock is also more robust against structural variations than AutoDock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16652207     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-006-9041-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  21 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins.

Authors:  D Rognan; S L Lauemoller; A Holm; S Buus; V Tschinke
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Gaussian docking functions.

Authors:  Mark R McGann; Harold R Almond; Anthony Nicholls; J Andrew Grant; Frank K Brown
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors.

Authors:  H J Böhm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry.

Authors:  B Honig; A Nicholls
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity.

Authors:  G Klebe; U Abraham; T Mietzner
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Protein Alpha Shape Similarity Analysis (PASSA): a new method for mapping protein binding sites. Application in the design of a selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinase 2.

Authors:  Kristin Tøndel; Endre Anderssen; Finn Drabløs
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving molecular docking through eHiTS' tunable scoring function.

Authors:  Orr Ravitz; Zsolt Zsoldos; Aniko Simon
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Software for molecular docking: a review.

Authors:  Nataraj S Pagadala; Khajamohiddin Syed; Jack Tuszynski
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-01-16

4.  Drug design for ever, from hype to hope.

Authors:  G Seddon; V Lounnas; R McGuire; T van den Bergh; R P Bywater; L Oliveira; G Vriend
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Sanjeevini: a freely accessible web-server for target directed lead molecule discovery.

Authors:  B Jayaram; Tanya Singh; Goutam Mukherjee; Abhinav Mathur; Shashank Shekhar; Vandana Shekhar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A high performance cloud-based protein-ligand docking prediction algorithm.

Authors:  Jui-Le Chen; Chun-Wei Tsai; Ming-Chao Chiang; Chu-Sing Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.