Literature DB >> 16651216

Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty.

Shee Yan Fong1, Stephan J DuPlessis, Steven Casha, R John Hurlbert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Disc arthroplasty is gaining momentum as a surgical procedure in the treatment of spinal degenerative disease. Results must be carefully scrutinized to recognize benefits as well as limitations.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with segmental kyphosis after Bryan disc replacement. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Prospective study of a consecutively enrolled cohort of 10 patients treated in a single center using the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis for single-level segmental reconstruction in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Radiographic and quality of life outcome measures.
METHODS: Static and dynamic lateral radiographs were digitally analyzed in patients undergoing Bryan disc arthroplasty throughout a minimum 3-month follow-up period. Observations were compared with preoperative studies looking for predictive factors of postoperative spinal alignment.
RESULTS: Postoperative end plate angles through the Bryan disc in the neutral position were kyphotic in 9 of 10 patients. Compared with preoperative end plate angulation there was a mean change of -7 degrees (towards kyphosis) in postoperative end plate alignment (p=.007, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6 degrees to -13 degrees). This correlated significantly with postoperative reduction in posterior vertebral body height of the caudal segment (p=.011, r2=.575) and postoperative functional spine unit (FSU) kyphosis (p=.032, r2=.46). Despite intraoperative distraction, postoperative FSU height was significantly reduced, on average by 1.7 mm (p=.040, 95% CI 0.5-2.8 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetrical end plate preparation occurs because of suboptimal coordinates to which the milling jig is referenced. Although segmental motion is preserved, Bryan disc arthroplasty demonstrates a propensity towards kyphotic orientation through the prosthesis likely as a result of intraoperative lordotic distraction. FSU angulation tends towards kyphosis and FSU height is decreased in the postoperative state from lack of anterior column support. Limitations of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty should be carefully considered when reconstruction or maintenance of cervical lordosis is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16651216     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  21 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Marc Anthony Limson; Soo-Bum Kim; Jose Joefrey F Arbatin; Kee-Young Chang; Moon-Soo Park; Jae-hyuk Shin; Yeong-Su Ju
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Sebastian Hartmann; Michaela Gstöttner; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Gabl; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical and radiological results of total disc replacement in the cervical spine with preoperative reducible kyphosis.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Zhimin He; Haisong Yang; Xinwei Wang; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  New Technologies: Should we Embrace them so Fast?

Authors:  N Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study.

Authors:  Qingpeng Song; Da He; Xiao Han; Ning Zhang; Jinchao Wang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after 18 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Maurizio Genitiempo; Andrea Perna; Domenico Alessandro Santagada; Maria Concetta Meluzio; Luca Proietti; Maria Beatrice Bocchi; Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Sagittal alignment and kinematics at instrumented and adjacent levels after total disc replacement in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Sabina Champain; Sophie Campana; Aymen Ramadan; Gilles Perrin; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Cervical arthroplasty with Discover prosthesis: clinical outcomes and analysis of factors that may influence postoperative range of motion.

Authors:  Jun Li; Lei Liang; Xiao-fei Ye; Min Qi; Hua-jiang Chen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.