Literature DB >> 32529522

Single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after 18 years of follow-up.

Maurizio Genitiempo1, Andrea Perna2, Domenico Alessandro Santagada1, Maria Concetta Meluzio1, Luca Proietti1,3, Maria Beatrice Bocchi1, Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino1,3, Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many studies reported mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty. Only a few studies analysed the long-term results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients treated with single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty after 18 years of follow-up.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of institutional databases concerning patients treated with Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. SF36 PCS, NDI and VAS were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. Standard, flexion-extension X-ray and MRI were used to evaluate the radiological results.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients treated with single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty completed the 18-year follow-up. At the final follow-up, a residual movement was observed in 32 patients (56%). The treated level range of motion decreased from 10.1° pre-operatively to 6.1° at the last follow-up (p = 0.0021). The range of motion of the adjacent segments and of the cervical spine had no significant change. Disc degeneration of the adjacent segment after 18-year follow-up was observed in 77.1% of treated patients.
CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiographic outcomes 18 years after surgery are acceptable. The treated level range of motion reduction and the adjacent segment degeneration seems not to affect the clinical results after 18 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bryan cervical disc prosthesis; Cervical prosthesis; Paravertebral ossification; Range of motion; Sagittal alignment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32529522     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06486-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  A Biomechanical Analysis of an Artificial Disc With a Shock-absorbing Core Property by Using Whole-cervical Spine Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  June Ho Lee; Won Man Park; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Adjacent Level Degeneration: Bryan Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Justin Miller; Rick Sasso; Paul Anderson; K Daniel Riew; Austin McPhilamy; Thomas Gianaris
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.876

3.  Effects of New Cage Profiles on the Improvement in Biomechanical Performance of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Teng Lu; Yibin Wang; Zhongwei Sun; Jialiang Li; Xijing He
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results Between Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement and Anterior Cervical Fusion: A 6-Year Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Kai Yan; Xiao Han; Jie Yu; Peihao Jin; Xiaoguang Han
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China.

Authors:  Yanbin Zhao; Yilong Zhang; Yu Sun; Shengfa Pan; Feifei Zhou; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  The Natural History of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Jefferson R Wilson
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study.

Authors:  Qingpeng Song; Da He; Xiao Han; Ning Zhang; Jinchao Wang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior cervical plating for the treatment of cervical disc herniation-a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Benedikt W Burkhardt; Moritz Brielmaier; Karsten Schwerdtfeger; Joachim M Oertel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Comparison of 10-year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Da He; Ning Zhang; Qingpeng Song; Jinchao Wang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Heterotopic Ossification After Prestige-LP Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Is Related to Insufficient Sagittal Coverage of the Endplate By the Prosthesis.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Yunsheng Ou; Xing Du; Bin He; Yuanqiang Li; Haoyang Yu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Effects of endplate coverage and intervertebral height change on heterotopic ossification following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Shen; Yi Yang; Hao Liu; Xin Rong; Chen Ding; Yang Meng; Bei-Yu Wang; Ying Hong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Mid-long-term follow-up of operated level kinematics after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement with Bryan disc.

Authors:  Chuanhong Li; Xing Yu; Yang Xiong; Yongdong Yang; Fengxian Wang; He Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Long-term follow-up MRI shows no hastening of adjacent segment degeneration following cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benedikt W Burkhardt; Lukas Baumann; Andreas Simgen; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Philipp Hendrix; Wolfgang Reith; Joachim M Oertel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.