INTRODUCTION: Persons diagnosed with schizophrenia demonstrate deficits in prosody recognition. To examine prosody along the schizophrenia spectrum, antipsychotic-naïve schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) subjects and healthy control subjects were compared. It was hypothesized that SPD subjects would perform more poorly; with cognitive and demographic factors contributing to the poor performance. The superior temporal gyrus (STG) was selected as the region-of-interest (ROI) given its known abnormalities in SPD and its important role in the processing of prosody. METHODS: SPD and healthy comparison (HC) subjects were matched on age, IQ, and parental social-economic status (PSES). Cognitive measures included the Speech Sound Perception Test (SSPT) to examine phonological processing (SPD=68, HC=74) and the Verbal Fluency task to examine executive functioning (SPD=129, HC=138). The main experiment was a novel fMRI task of prosody identification using semantically neutral sentences spoken with emotional prosody (SPD=16, HC=13). Finally, volumetric measurement of the superior temporal sulcus (STS), a key region for processing prosody, and partially overlapping with the STG, was performed (SPD=30, HC=30). RESULTS: Phonological processing and executive functioning were both impaired in SPD subjects compared with HC subjects. Contrary to the prediction, SPD subjects, as a group, were similar to HC subjects in terms of correctly indentifying the emotion conveyed and reaction time. Within the SPD group, prosody identification accuracy was influenced by executive functioning, IQ and perhaps PSES, relationships not found with HC subjects. Phonological perception aided prosody identification in both diagnostic groups. As expected, both groups activated the STG while performing the prosody identification task. However, SPD subjects may have been less "efficient" in their recruitment of STG neurons. Finally, SPD subjects demonstrated a trend toward smaller STS volumes on the left, particularly the lower bank. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that subtle differences between SPD and controls in phonological processing, executive functioning, IQ, and possibly PSES, contributed to difficulty in processing prosody for some SPD subjects. Published by Elsevier B.V.
INTRODUCTION:Persons diagnosed with schizophrenia demonstrate deficits in prosody recognition. To examine prosody along the schizophrenia spectrum, antipsychotic-naïve schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) subjects and healthy control subjects were compared. It was hypothesized that SPD subjects would perform more poorly; with cognitive and demographic factors contributing to the poor performance. The superior temporal gyrus (STG) was selected as the region-of-interest (ROI) given its known abnormalities in SPD and its important role in the processing of prosody. METHODS: SPD and healthy comparison (HC) subjects were matched on age, IQ, and parental social-economic status (PSES). Cognitive measures included the Speech Sound Perception Test (SSPT) to examine phonological processing (SPD=68, HC=74) and the Verbal Fluency task to examine executive functioning (SPD=129, HC=138). The main experiment was a novel fMRI task of prosody identification using semantically neutral sentences spoken with emotional prosody (SPD=16, HC=13). Finally, volumetric measurement of the superior temporal sulcus (STS), a key region for processing prosody, and partially overlapping with the STG, was performed (SPD=30, HC=30). RESULTS: Phonological processing and executive functioning were both impaired in SPD subjects compared with HC subjects. Contrary to the prediction, SPD subjects, as a group, were similar to HC subjects in terms of correctly indentifying the emotion conveyed and reaction time. Within the SPD group, prosody identification accuracy was influenced by executive functioning, IQ and perhaps PSES, relationships not found with HC subjects. Phonological perception aided prosody identification in both diagnostic groups. As expected, both groups activated the STG while performing the prosody identification task. However, SPD subjects may have been less "efficient" in their recruitment of STG neurons. Finally, SPD subjects demonstrated a trend toward smaller STS volumes on the left, particularly the lower bank. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that subtle differences between SPD and controls in phonological processing, executive functioning, IQ, and possibly PSES, contributed to difficulty in processing prosody for some SPD subjects. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Sophie van Rijn; André Aleman; Eric van Diessen; Celine Berckmoes; Guy Vingerhoets; René S Kahn Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: E D Ross; D M Orbelo; J Cartwright; S Hansel; M Burgard; J A Testa; R Buck Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: J E Downhill; M S Buchsbaum; T Wei; J Spiegel-Cohen; E A Hazlett; M M Haznedar; J Silverman; L J Siever Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2000-05-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Toshiaki Onitsuka; Martha E Shenton; Dean F Salisbury; Chandlee C Dickey; Kiyoto Kasai; Sarah K Toner; Melissa Frumin; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert W McCarley Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: L J Siever; F Amin; E F Coccaro; D Bernstein; R J Kavoussi; O Kalus; T B Horvath; P Warne; M Davidson; K L Davis Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ulrich Ettinger; Christine Mohr; Diane C Gooding; Alex S Cohen; Alexander Rapp; Corinna Haenschel; Sohee Park Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Chandlee C Dickey; Mai-Anh T Vu; Martina M Voglmaier; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Robert W McCarley; Lawrence P Panych Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ulrich Ettinger; Inga Meyhöfer; Maria Steffens; Michael Wagner; Nikolaos Koutsouleris Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Kathy Burton Avsar; Rosalyn Eve Weller; James Edward Cox; Meredith Amanda Reid; David Matthew White; Adrienne Carol Lahti Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 2.708