Wendy E Weller1, Edward L Hannan. 1. Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY 12144-3456, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the number of bariatric procedures has grown recently, few studies have focused on the relationship between provider volume and outcomes among patients undergoing a bariatric procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Using New York State's inpatient discharge database, we identified adults undergoing a bariatric procedure in New York State between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003 (n=7,868). Separate multivariable statistical models were constructed to examine the relationship between surgeon volume and hospital volume and postoperative complications (using surgeon volume cutpoints of 25, 50, 100, 150 and hospital volume cutpoints of 100, 125, 150, 200) while controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbidity. RESULTS: There was a considerably higher likelihood of postoperative complications among surgeons performing 100 or fewer bariatric procedures compared with those performing more than 100 procedures (odds ratio [OR]: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.59 to 3.59) and for those performing 150 or fewer procedures compared with those performing more than 150 procedures (odds ratio: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.25) after risk adjustment. Likewise, for each of the four hospital volume cutpoints, there was a notably higher likelihood of postoperative complications in the lower volume hospitals. Analyses of the interaction between surgeon and hospital volume indicated a markedly higher likelihood of postoperative complications among patients operated on by a low-volume surgeon (100 procedures or fewer) in a low-volume hospital (150 procedures or fewer) or a low-volume surgeon in a high-volume hospital than among patients operated on by a high-volume surgeon in a high-volume hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of postoperative complications from bariatric procedures is greater for patients with low-volume surgeons or in low-volume hospitals.
BACKGROUND: Although the number of bariatric procedures has grown recently, few studies have focused on the relationship between provider volume and outcomes among patients undergoing a bariatric procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Using New York State's inpatient discharge database, we identified adults undergoing a bariatric procedure in New York State between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003 (n=7,868). Separate multivariable statistical models were constructed to examine the relationship between surgeon volume and hospital volume and postoperative complications (using surgeon volume cutpoints of 25, 50, 100, 150 and hospital volume cutpoints of 100, 125, 150, 200) while controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbidity. RESULTS: There was a considerably higher likelihood of postoperative complications among surgeons performing 100 or fewer bariatric procedures compared with those performing more than 100 procedures (odds ratio [OR]: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.59 to 3.59) and for those performing 150 or fewer procedures compared with those performing more than 150 procedures (odds ratio: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.25) after risk adjustment. Likewise, for each of the four hospital volume cutpoints, there was a notably higher likelihood of postoperative complications in the lower volume hospitals. Analyses of the interaction between surgeon and hospital volume indicated a markedly higher likelihood of postoperative complications among patients operated on by a low-volume surgeon (100 procedures or fewer) in a low-volume hospital (150 procedures or fewer) or a low-volume surgeon in a high-volume hospital than among patients operated on by a high-volume surgeon in a high-volume hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of postoperative complications from bariatric procedures is greater for patients with low-volume surgeons or in low-volume hospitals.
Authors: John Saunders; Garth H Ballantyne; Scott Belsley; Daniel J Stephens; Amit Trivedi; Douglas R Ewing; Vincent A Iannace; Rafael F Capella; Annette Wasileweski; Steven Moran; Hans J Schmidt Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-05-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Aristithes G Doumouras; Fady Saleh; Sama Anvari; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Aristithes G Doumouras; Fady Saleh; Sama Anvari; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Oliver A Varban; Bradley N Reames; Jonathan F Finks; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Michel M Murr; Taylor Martin; Krista Haines; Tracy Torrella; Robert Dragotti; Ali Kandil; Scott F Gallagher; Scott Harmsen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.969