Literature DB >> 16646797

Classifying gene expression profiles from pairwise mRNA comparisons.

Donald Geman1, Christian d'Avignon, Daniel Q Naiman, Raimond L Winslow.   

Abstract

We present a new approach to molecular classification based on mRNA comparisons. Our method, referred to as the top-scoring pair(s) (TSP) classifier, is motivated by current technical and practical limitations in using gene expression microarray data for class prediction, for example to detect disease, identify tumors or predict treatment response. Accurate statistical inference from such data is difficult due to the small number of observations, typically tens, relative to the large number of genes, typically thousands. Moreover, conventional methods from machine learning lead to decisions which are usually very difficult to interpret in simple or biologically meaningful terms. In contrast, the TSP classifier provides decision rules which i) involve very few genes and only relative expression values (e.g., comparing the mRNA counts within a single pair of genes); ii) are both accurate and transparent; and iii) provide specific hypotheses for follow-up studies. In particular, the TSP classifier achieves prediction rates with standard cancer data that are as high as those of previous studies which use considerably more genes and complex procedures. Finally, the TSP classifier is parameter-free, thus avoiding the type of over-fitting and inflated estimates of performance that result when all aspects of learning a predictor are not properly cross-validated.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 16646797      PMCID: PMC1989150          DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  29 in total

Review 1.  Complement. First of two parts.

Authors:  M J Walport
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Multifunctional alpha-enolase: its role in diseases.

Authors:  V Pancholi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  A CART-based approach to discover emerging patterns in microarray data.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Gerhard Tutz; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification.

Authors:  Richard Simon; Michael D Radmacher; Kevin Dobbin; Lisa M McShane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Molecular classification of multiple tumor types.

Authors:  C H Yeang; S Ramaswamy; P Tamayo; S Mukherjee; R M Rifkin; M Angelo; M Reich; E Lander; J Mesirov; T Golub
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles.

Authors:  M West; C Blanchette; H Dressman; E Huang; S Ishida; R Spang; H Zuzan; J A Olson; J R Marks; J R Nevins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cell and tumor classification using gene expression data: construction of forests.

Authors:  Heping Zhang; Chang-Yung Yu; Burton Singer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Developing optimal prediction models for cancer classification using gene expression data.

Authors:  Mat Soukup; Jae K Lee
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.122

9.  Making sense of microarrays.

Authors:  J N Siedow
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  New feature subset selection procedures for classification of expression profiles.

Authors:  Trond Bø; Inge Jonassen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  127 in total

1.  Gene signatures revisited.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Identification of Marker Genes for Cancer Based on Microarrays Using a Computational Biology Approach.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang
Journal:  Curr Bioinform       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.543

Review 3.  Systems approaches to molecular cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Shuyi Ma; Cory C Funk; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.970

4.  Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Aik Choon Tan; Daniel Q Naiman; Lei Xu; Raimond L Winslow; Donald Geman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  SingleCellNet: A Computational Tool to Classify Single Cell RNA-Seq Data Across Platforms and Across Species.

Authors:  Yuqi Tan; Patrick Cahan
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 10.304

6.  Relative expression analysis for identifying perturbed pathways.

Authors:  James A Eddy; Donald Geman; Nathan D Price
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

7.  Accurate molecular classification of cancer using simple rules.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang; Osamu Gotoh
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Iterative Bayesian Model Averaging: a method for the application of survival analysis to high-dimensional microarray data.

Authors:  Amalia Annest; Roger E Bumgarner; Adrian E Raftery; Ka Yee Yeung
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Microarray-based cancer prediction using soft computing approach.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang; Osamu Gotoh
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2009-05-26

10.  The ordering of expression among a few genes can provide simple cancer biomarkers and signal BRCA1 mutations.

Authors:  Xue Lin; Bahman Afsari; Luigi Marchionni; Leslie Cope; Giovanni Parmigiani; Daniel Naiman; Donald Geman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.