Literature DB >> 11694784

Testing for HER2 status.

W Hanna1.   

Abstract

Incorporation of a new biological marker such as HER2 into routine clinical practice requires proof that it provides reproducible information independent of, and better than, conventional pathologic criteria, and that it influences treatment decisions. In breast cancer, HER2 amplification/overexpression predicts for a poor clinical outcome and an enhanced survival benefit from the HER2-targeted therapy, Herceptin, and may predict for resistance to some conventional therapies. Thus, HER2 is considered to be a clinically important molecule and testing for HER2 abnormalities is already part of routine patient assessment in many parts of the world. There is currently no gold standard for HER2 testing. The main challenge is to standardize and technically validate HER2 testing methodologies. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are the most common HER2 tests used, and show a high level of concordance. HER2 testing approaches based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are under extensive investigation and appear promising. A Canadian HER2 testing algorithm designed to increase the validity and reproducibility of HER2 testing has been compiled. HER2-positive cases are defined as those with >10% of tumor cells with moderate/strong, complete membrane staining in the invasive component, by IHC. Confirmatory HER2 testing using either FISH or quantitative PCR is recommended for indeterminate cases. Additional studies are required to calibrate HER2 testing results to clinical outcome. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11694784     DOI: 10.1159/000055398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of HER2 gene amplification using an automated fluorescence in situ hybridization signal enumeration system.

Authors:  Rachel Stevens; Imad Almanaseer; Miguel Gonzalez; Derin Caglar; Ryan A Knudson; Rhett P Ketterling; Daniel S Schrock; Thomas A Seemayer; Julia A Bridge
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Cytogenomics of cancers: from chromosome to sequence.

Authors:  Alain Bernheim
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Early tumor response to Hsp90 therapy using HER2 PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Peter M Smith-Jones; David Solit; Farzana Afroze; Neal Rosen; Steven M Larson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  A robust automated measure of average antibody staining in immunohistochemistry images.

Authors:  Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Kevin J Yagle; Paul E Swanson; Kenneth A Krohn; Joseph G Rajendran
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Expression of activator protein-1 (AP-1) family members in breast cancer.

Authors:  Amirhossein Kharman-Biz; Hui Gao; Reza Ghiasvand; Chunyan Zhao; Kazem Zendehdel; Karin Dahlman-Wright
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: an international validation ring study.

Authors:  Marc van de Vijver; Michael Bilous; Wedad Hanna; Manfred Hofmann; Petra Kristel; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Josef Rüschoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Expression of the three components of linear ubiquitin assembly complex in breast cancer.

Authors:  Amirhossein Kharman-Biz; Hui Gao; Reza Ghiasvand; Lars-Arne Haldosen; Kazem Zendehdel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.