| Literature DB >> 16643653 |
Khadija I Yahya-Malima1, Bjørg E Olsen, Mecky I Matee, Knut Fylkesnes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many national antenatal clinics (ANC) based HIV surveillance systems in sub-Saharan Africa have limited coverage of remote rural sites, a weakness that compromises adequate estimation, monitoring and development of effective preventive and care programmes. To address this void in rural Manyara and Singida within Northern Tanzania, we conducted antenatal clinic-based sentinel surveillance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16643653 PMCID: PMC1471787 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Socio-demographic characteristics among HIV tested antenatal attendees, rural Manyara and Singida regions, Tanzania, 2003–2004.
| 15–19 years | 165 (12.7) | 56 (10.1) | 109 (14.7) |
| 20–24 years | 417 (32.2) | 182 (32.9) | 235 (31.6) |
| 25–29 years | 349 (26.9) | 151 (27.3) | 198 (26.7) |
| ≥30 years | 365 (28.2) | 164 (29.7) | 201 (27.1) |
| > 1 year | 1197 (92.4) | 534 (96.6) | 663 (89.2) |
| < 1 year | 99 (7.6) | 19 (3.4) | 80 (10.8) |
| Married | 1183 (91.3) | 525 (94.9) | 658 (88.6) |
| Separated/divorced/widowed/single | 113 (8.7) | 28 (5.1) | 85 (11.4) |
| Never married | 93 (7.2) | 19 (3.4) | 74 (10.0) |
| < 18 years | 203 (15.7) | 95 (17.2) | 108 (14.5) |
| ≥18 years | 1000 (77.1) | 439 (79.4) | 561 (75.5) |
| Christians | 999 (77.1) | 414 (74.9) | 585 (78.7) |
| Muslims | 153 (11.8) | 77 (13.9) | 76 (10.2) |
| Others | 144 (11.1) | 62 (11.2) | 82 (11.0) |
| None | 349 (28.2) | 156 (28.2) | 193 (26.0) |
| < 7 years | 174 (13.4) | 78 (14.1) | 96 (12.9) |
| 7 years or more | 773 (59.7) | 319 (57.7) | 454 (61.1) |
| Yes | 204 (15.7) | 38 (6.9) | 166 (22.3) |
| No | 1087 (83.9) | 512 (93.1) | 575 (77.7) |
| No | 1233 (95.1) | 532 (96.2) | 701 (94.4) |
| Yes | 63 (4.9) | 21 (3.8) | 42 (5.7) |
| One | 1231 (95.0) | 525 (94.9) | 706 (95.0) |
| More than one | 65 (5.0) | 28 (5.1) | 37 (5.0) |
| No | 891 (68.8) | 376 (68.0) | 515 (69.3) |
| Yes | 405 (31.3) | 177 (32.0) | 228 (30.7) |
| < 18 years | 158 (14.0) | 73 (13.2) | 85 (11.4) |
| ≥18 years | 974 (86.0) | 424 (76.7) | 550 (74.0) |
| No | 1153 (88.8) | 489 (88.4) | 662 (89.1) |
| Yes | 145 (11.2) | 64 (11.6) | 81 (10.9) |
* Analysed for women aged ≥20 years at the time of survey.
Figure 1Age – specific HIV prevalence among antenatal attendees in Rural Manyara and Singida regions, Tanzania, 2003–2004.
Profiles of antenatal attendees, associated with HIV infection, rural Manyara and Singida within northern Tanzania, 2003–2004.
| 15–19 years | 165 (12.7) | 3.03 (1.12–7.30) | 1.0 | - | 1.0 |
| 20–24 years | 417 (32.2) | 1.92 (0.89–3.40) | 0.6 (0.20–1.94) | 0.7 (0.20–2.47) | |
| 25–29 years | 349 (26.9) | 1.43 (0.53–3.51) | 0.5 (0.13–1.63) | 0.6 (0.14–2.30) | |
| ≥30 years | 365 (28.2) | 2.19 (1.02–4.44) | 0.7 (0.23–2.23) | 0.7 (0.20–2.78) | |
| Remote rural | 553 (42.7) | 1.3 (0.56–2.71) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Rural | 743 (57.3) | 2.6 (1.59–4.04) | 2.1 (0.85–4.90) | 2.0 (0.84–4.87) | 2.4 (0.95–6.18) |
| Married | 1183 (91.3) | 1.9 (1.20–2.85) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Single/divorced/separated | 113 (8.7) | 3.5 (1.14–9.35) | 1.9 (0.65–5.72) | 1.8 (0.55–5.57) | 1.3 (0.35–4.72) |
| None | 349 (28.2) | 3.24 (1.67–5.73) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1–6 years | 174 (13.4) | 1.15 (0.20–4.52) | 0.4 (0.08–1.63) | 0.4 (0.08–1.61) | 0.3 (0.68–1.64) |
| 7 years or more | 773 (59.7) | 1.71 (0.96–2.99) | 0.5 (0.23–1.19) | 0.5 (0.23–1.19) | 0.5 (0.20–1.14) |
| 1 only | 1231 (95.0) | 1.7 (1.11–2.69) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| > 1 | 65 (5.0) | 7.7 (2.87–17.75) | 4.8(1.75–13.17) | 5.4(1.91–15.43) | |
| < 18 years | 158 (14.0) | 4.4 (1.20–4.40) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| ≥18 years | 974 (86.0) | 1.5 (0.71–2.19) | 0.3 (0.13–0.72) | 0.3(0.12–0.79) | |
| No | 1088 (84.0) | 1.6 (0.94–2.54) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 208 (16.0) | 4.3 (2.13–8.32) | 2.8 (1.25–6.48) | 2.9(1.27–6.61) | 2.1 (0.79–5.71) |
| No | 1151(88.8) | 1.91 (1.11–2.69) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 145 (11.2) | 2.76 (0.09–5.43) | 1.5 (0.49–4.29) | 0.9 (0.91–1.04) | 1.8 (0.59–5.56) |
| No | 1135 (87.6) | 1.7 (1.04–2.65) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 161 (12.4) | 6.2 (3.19–11.44) | 4.6 (2.06–10.39) | 4.8(2.14–10.90) | |
| No | 1233 (95.1) | 1.9 (1.15–2.74) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 63 (4.9) | 6.4 (2.05–16.25) | 3.7 (1.25–11.18) | 3.6 (1.18–11.07) | 3.2 (0.87–12.06) |
| No | 891 (68.8) | 1.3 (0.73–2.41) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Yes | 405 (31.2) | 3.5 (1.98–5.87) | 2.6 (1.20–5.72) | 2.6 (1.2–5.72) | (0.72–4.43) |
β Analysed for those aged 20 ≥ years at the time of survey,
† Variables included in the final model.
Likelihood-ratio-test (assuming reduced model nested in full model): x2(5) = 4.52, P = 0.48
Logistic model for HIV, goodness-of-fit test; x2(35) = 31.33, P = 0.64 and predictive power of the model = 78% [45]