OBJECTIVE: To analyse the survival benefit of resecting local recurrence (LR) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the presence and absence of concomitant metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2004 we identified 34 patients with LRs (2.9%) of the 1165 radical nephrectomies performed for T1-4N0M0 disease. Of these, 18 (53%) had no evidence of metastasis (isolated LR incidence, 1.5%) and 16 (47%) had synchronous metastasis. Of the 18 patients with no metastasis, 11 had complete surgical resection (group I) and seven had nonsurgical therapy (group II). Of the 16 patients with synchronous metastasis, five had surgery (group III) and 11 did not (group IV). Survival was projected using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test for each group. RESULTS: Eight of the 34 patients (24%) were symptomatic. The T stage of the initial nephrectomy was T1a in two cases, T1b in six, T2 in five, T3a in six, T3b in eight, T4 in six and unknown in one; 22 patients (65%) had clear cell histology. There were no significant differences in median time to LR or the LR size among the groups. The median (range) follow-up was 16.9 (0.5-103.6) months. Of the 11 patients in group I, three remain with no evidence of disease, three are alive with metastatic disease, and five died from disease. By contrast, 21 of the 23 patients (91%) in groups II, III and IV died from disease. The overall estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year survivals were 63%, 31% and 18%. The median survival time was 71.4 months for group I, 9.9 for II, 16.3 for III, and 11.8 for IV (P < 0.01) with a 5-year survival of 62% for group I and 0% for groups II, III, and IV. CONCLUSIONS: LR after radical nephrectomy is rare (2.9%) and has a poor prognosis. The presence of synchronous metastasis and nonoperative therapy are related to these low survival rates. However, if there is no metastatic disease, complete surgical resection of LRs is associated with improved survival.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the survival benefit of resecting local recurrence (LR) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the presence and absence of concomitant metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2004 we identified 34 patients with LRs (2.9%) of the 1165 radical nephrectomies performed for T1-4N0M0 disease. Of these, 18 (53%) had no evidence of metastasis (isolated LR incidence, 1.5%) and 16 (47%) had synchronous metastasis. Of the 18 patients with no metastasis, 11 had complete surgical resection (group I) and seven had nonsurgical therapy (group II). Of the 16 patients with synchronous metastasis, five had surgery (group III) and 11 did not (group IV). Survival was projected using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test for each group. RESULTS: Eight of the 34 patients (24%) were symptomatic. The T stage of the initial nephrectomy was T1a in two cases, T1b in six, T2 in five, T3a in six, T3b in eight, T4 in six and unknown in one; 22 patients (65%) had clear cell histology. There were no significant differences in median time to LR or the LR size among the groups. The median (range) follow-up was 16.9 (0.5-103.6) months. Of the 11 patients in group I, three remain with no evidence of disease, three are alive with metastatic disease, and five died from disease. By contrast, 21 of the 23 patients (91%) in groups II, III and IV died from disease. The overall estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year survivals were 63%, 31% and 18%. The median survival time was 71.4 months for group I, 9.9 for II, 16.3 for III, and 11.8 for IV (P < 0.01) with a 5-year survival of 62% for group I and 0% for groups II, III, and IV. CONCLUSIONS: LR after radical nephrectomy is rare (2.9%) and has a poor prognosis. The presence of synchronous metastasis and nonoperative therapy are related to these low survival rates. However, if there is no metastatic disease, complete surgical resection of LRs is associated with improved survival.
Authors: Ziho Lee; Opeyemi A Jegede; Naomi B Haas; Michael R Pins; Edward M Messing; Judith Manola; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Michael A S Jewett; Keith T Flaherty; Janice P Dutcher; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo Journal: J Urol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: F A Calvo; C V Sole; R Martinez-Monge; I Azinovic; J Aristu; J Zudaire; J L Garcia-Sabrido; J M Berian Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Paolo Capogrosso; Alessandro Larcher; Daniel D Sjoberg; Emily A Vertosick; Francesco Cianflone; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Cristina Carenzi; Andrea Salonia; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini; Umberto Capitanio Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Arun Z Thomas; Mehrad Adibi; Leonardo D Borregales; Ly N Hoang; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Nizar M Tannir; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Tim J van Oostenbrugge; Stephanie G C Kroeze; J L H Ruud Bosch; Harm H E van Melick Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 4.226