Literature DB >> 16642855

The influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative identification.

Benjamin Munson1, Sarah V Jefferson, Elizabeth C McDonald.   

Abstract

Listeners are more likely to hear a synthetic fricative ambiguous between /s/ and /integral/ as /integral/ if it is appended to a woman's voice than a man's voice [Strand and Johnson, in Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS Conference (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996), pp. 14-26]. This study expanded on this finding by replicating the result with a much larger group of male and female talkers than had been examined previously, by examining whether phonetic context mediates the influence of talker sex on fricative identification, and by examining whether talkers' perceived sexual orientation influences fricative identification. Stimuli were created by pairing a synthetic nine-step /s/-/integral/ continuum with tokens of /ae k/ and /Ip/ taken from productions of shack and ship by 44 talkers whose perceived sexual orientation had been reported previously [Munson et al., J. Phonetics (in press)]. Listeners participated in a series of two-alternative sack-shack and sip-ship identification experiments. Listeners identified more /integral/ tokens for women's voices than for men's voices for both continua. Lesbian/bisexual-sounding women elicited more sack and sip responses than heterosexual-sounding women. No consistent influence of perceived sexual orientation on fricative identification was noted for men's voices. Results suggest that listeners are sensitive to the association between fricatives' center frequencies and perceived sexual orientation in women's voices, but not in men's voices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16642855     DOI: 10.1121/1.2173521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for accommodating gender-related talker differences heard by listeners with normal hearing and with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ashley N Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Age-related changes to spectral voice characteristics affect judgments of prosodic, segmental, and talker attributes for child and adult speech.

Authors:  Laura C Dilley; Elizabeth A Wieland; Jessica L Gamache; J Devin McAuley; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Social Priming in Speech Perception: Revisiting Kangaroo/Kiwi Priming in New Zealand English.

Authors:  Gia Hurring; Jennifer Hay; Katie Drager; Ryan Podlubny; Laura Manhire; Alix Ellis
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  The use of auditory and visual context in speech perception by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ariane E Rhone; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05

6.  Gender identity is indexed and perceived in speech.

Authors:  Melanie Weirich; Adrian P Simpson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Social Meaning of Contextualized Sibilant Alternations in Berlin German.

Authors:  Melanie Weirich; Stefanie Jannedy; Gediminas Schüppenhauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-29

8.  The own-voice benefit for word recognition in early bilinguals.

Authors:  Sarah Cheung; Molly Babel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02

Review 9.  Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Authors:  Constanze Lenschow; Ana Rita P Mendes; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.