Literature DB >> 16641775

Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Rudolf Bertagnoli1, James J Yue, Trace Kershaw, Rahul V Shah, Frank Pfeiffer, Andrea Fenk-Mayer, Regina Nanieva, Armin Karg, Daniel S Husted, John W Emerson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical series.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of ProDisc lumbar artificial disc replacement (ADR) in smokers versus nonsmokers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Smoking is a negative predictor in fusion surgery. To date, a prospective study of the treatment of incapacitating discogenic low back pain using ADR in smokers versus nonsmokers has not been described.
METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 104 patients with disabling discogenic low back pain treated with single-level lumbar ProDisc total disc arthroplasty. Smokers and nonsmokers were assessed before surgery and after surgery using patient satisfaction, Oswestry, and Visual Analog Scores. Additionally, preoperative and postoperative neurologic, radiographic, and pain medication assessments were performed at similar postoperative intervals.
RESULTS: Oswestry, Visual Analog Scores, and patient satisfaction scores revealed statistical improvement beginning 3 months after surgery and were maintained at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient satisfaction scores were higher in smokers (94%) than in nonsmokers (87%) at 2-year follow-up (P = 0.07). Radiographic analysis revealed an affected disc height increase from 4 mm to 13 mm (P < 0.05) and an affected disc motion from 3 degrees to 7 degrees (P < 0.05). No cases of loosening, dislodgment, mechanical failure, infection, or fusion of the affected segment occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that smokers do equally well compared with nonsmokers when ProDisc ADR is used in the treatment of debilitating lumbar spondylosis. Patient outcome and radiographic scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative levels. Although not evident in our series, additional surveillance for intraoperative and postoperative vascular spasm and occlusion may be warranted in smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641775     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214970.07626.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

3.  Measurement of the normal lumbar intervertebral disc space using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chang Hwa Hong; Jong Seok Park; Ki Jin Jung; Woo Jong Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-23

4.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  Does vertebral endplate morphology influence outcomes in lumbar disc arthroplasty? Part I: an initial assessment of a novel classification system of lumbar endplate morphology.

Authors:  James J Yue; Matthew E Oetgen; Jorge J Jaramillo-de la Torre; Rudolf Bertagnoli
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-03-01

Review 7.  Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases.

Authors:  Chun Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-11-30

8.  Prevention of vertebral body-splitting fractures after multilevel ProDisc-L implantation.

Authors:  Humbert G Sullivan; Rudolf Bertagnoli; Mark A Nigogosyan; Nicholas R Ladwig; Hayley L Born; Molly M Cerniglia; Hartmann Habbicht; Michelle A Mathiason; Vicki L McHugh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

9.  Does Vertebral Endplate Morphology Influence Outcomes in Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty? Part II: Clinical and Radiographic Results as Evaluated Utilizing the Vertebral Endplate Yue-Bertagnoli (VEYBR) Classification.

Authors:  Matthew E Oetgen; James J Yue; Jorge J Jaramillo-de la Torre; Rudolf Bertagnoli
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-06-01

10.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.