Literature DB >> 16641354

Prostate cancer evaluated with ferumoxtran-10-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: early experience.

Roel A M Heesakkers1, Jurgen J Fütterer, Anke M Hövels, Harrie C M van den Bosch, Tom W J Scheenen, Yvonne L Hoogeveen, Jelle O Barentsz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of ferumoxtran-10-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at high magnetic field strength (3.0 T) and to compare image quality between 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging in terms of lymph node detection in patients with prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Forty-eight consecutive patients aged 51-79 years (mean, 65.5 years) with prostate cancer were enrolled. T2*-weighted 1.5- and 3.0-T MR images of the pelvis were acquired in a sagittal plane parallel to the psoas muscle 24 hours after ferumoxtran-10 administration. A pelvic and body phased-array coil was used and yielded an in-plane resolution of 0.56 x 0.56 x 3.00 mm at 1.5 T and 0.50 x 0.50 x 2.50 mm at 3.0 T. All images were evaluated by three readers for total image quality, lymph node border delineation, muscle-fat contrast, and vessel-fat contrast. Statistical significance was calculated by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Subsequently, the general linear mixed model was used to estimate the contributions of three factors-patient, reader, and technique-to the variability of the imaging results.
RESULTS: Significantly (P < .05) better muscle-fat contrast, vessel-fat contrast, lymph node border delineation, and total image quality were observed at 3.0-T MR imaging. The general linear mixed model revealed that the variability of all results could be attributed to the use of 3.0-T imaging.
CONCLUSION: Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR imaging can be performed at high magnetic field strengths and result in improved image quality, which may lead to improved detection of small positive lymph nodes. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16641354     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392050411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Management of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement: a rapidly evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Gilles Créhange; Chien Peter Chen; Charles C Hsu; Norbert Kased; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  A Phase I Dosing Study of Ferumoxytol for MR Lymphography at 3 T in Patients With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Harsh K Agarwal; Joanna Shih; Marcelino Bernardo; Yolanda L McKinney; Dagane Daar; Gary L Griffiths; Sandeep Sankineni; Linda Johnson; Kinzya B Grant; Juanita Weaver; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Mukesh Harisinghani; Paula Jacobs; William Dahut; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Lymph node staging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Anna M Brown; Michele Fascelli; Yan Mee Law; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance lymphography in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Noor Jahan; Priya Narayanan; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of lymph nodes in cancer patients.

Authors:  Seung Hong Choi; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Positive contrast MR-lymphography using inversion recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON).

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Lijun Tang; Dorota Kedziorek; Kenyatta Cosby; Wesley D Gilson; Evert-Jan Vonken; Michael Schär; David Sosnovik; Dara L Kraitchman; Robert G Weiss; Ralf Weissleder; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Induced clustered nanoconfinement of superparamagnetic iron oxide in biodegradable nanoparticles enhances transverse relaxivity for targeted theranostics.

Authors:  Ragy R T Ragheb; Dongin Kim; Arunima Bandyopadhyay; Halima Chahboune; Beyza Bulutoglu; Harib Ezaldein; Jason M Criscione; Tarek M Fahmy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Defining the radiobiology of prostate cancer progression: An important question in translational prostate cancer research.

Authors:  Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Donaldson; Linda Johnson; Baris Turkbey; Gennady Bratslavsky; Leszek Kotula
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-05-30

Review 10.  Lymph node imaging in initial staging of prostate cancer: An overview and update.

Authors:  Jessica G Zarzour; Sam Galgano; Jonathan McConathy; John V Thomas; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.