Literature DB >> 16639945

Effect of group size and structure on the welfare and performance of pregnant sows in pens with electronic sow feeders.

Leena Anil1, Sukumarannair S Anil, John Deen, Samuel K Baidoo, Roger D Walker.   

Abstract

Pregnant sows were housed in dynamic, twice-mixed, and static groups of different sizes in pens with electronic sow feeders (ESFs) to study the effect of group size and structure on sow welfare and performance. The total injury score (TIS) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the dynamic group than in the other groups in general and 2 wk after mixing. The salivary cortisol concentrations were similar in the 3 groups. The frequency of queuing was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the twice-mixed group and the frequency of nonagonistic social interactions significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the dynamic group. The total number of aggressive acts was positively and significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with the frequency and duration of queuing in all the groups. Farrowing performance and longevity did not differ between the groups. The higher TIS and lower number of nonagonistic social interactions indicated that welfare was compromised in the dynamic group as compared with the other groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16639945      PMCID: PMC1410729     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestation stalls versus group pens with electronic sow feeders.

Authors:  Leena Anil; Kristy M G Bhend; Samuel K Baidoo; Rebecca Morrison; John Deen
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  Evaluation of well-being, productivity, and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls.

Authors:  Leena Anil; Sukumarannair S Anil; John Deen; Samuel K Baidoo; Jonathan E Wheaton
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders.

Authors:  N J Hodgkiss; J C Eddison; P H Brooks; P Bugg
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1998-11-28       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  The circadian rhythm of salivary cortisol in growing pigs: effects of age, gender, and stress.

Authors:  M A Ruis; J H Te Brake; B Engel; E D Ekkel; W G Buist; H J Blokhuis; J M Koolhaas
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-09

5.  Aggressive behaviour amongst groups of domesticated pigs kept at various stocking rates.

Authors:  R Ewbank; M J Bryant
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Some effects of stocking rate and group size upon agonistic behaviour in groups of growing pigs.

Authors:  M J Bryant; R Ewbank
Journal:  Br Vet J       Date:  1972-02

7.  Evaluation of housing systems for sows.

Authors:  L A den Hartog; G B Backus; H M Vermeer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Changes in pig salivary cortisol in response to transport simulation, food and water deprivation, and mixing.

Authors:  R F Parrott; B H Misson
Journal:  Br Vet J       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Effect of familiarity and mixing method on gestating sow welfare and productivity in large dynamic groups.

Authors:  Meghann K Pierdon; Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Twelve Threats of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) for Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Frank A M Tuyttens; Carla F M Molento; Said Benaissa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Animal Welfare and the Acknowledgment of Cultural Differences.

Authors:  Arlene Garcia; John J McGlone
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Risk Factors for Chronic Stress in Sows Housed in Groups, and Associated Risks of Prenatal Stress in Their Offspring.

Authors:  Martyna Ewa Lagoda; Joanna Marchewka; Keelin O'Driscoll; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-12

5.  A systematic review of the impact of housing on sow welfare during post-weaning and early pregnancy periods.

Authors:  Jen-Yun Chou; Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups.

Authors:  Emilie-Julie Bos; Dominiek Maes; Miriam M J van Riet; Sam Millet; Bart Ampe; Geert P J Janssens; Frank A M Tuyttens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.