Literature DB >> 16261839

Evaluation of well-being, productivity, and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls.

Leena Anil1, Sukumarannair S Anil, John Deen, Samuel K Baidoo, Jonathan E Wheaton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare well-being, performance, and longevity of gestating sows housed in stalls or in pens with an electronic sow feeder (ESF). ANIMALS: 382 pregnant sows of parities 1 through 6. PROCEDURE: Sows were housed in separate stalls (n = 176) or group pens (206) with an ESF. Well-being of sows was assessed at various time points in terms of injuries, salivary cortisol concentration, and behavior in a novel arena or to a novel object. Farrowing performance and longevity of sows were also assessed.
RESULTS: Total injury scores (TIS) of sows in pens were significantly higher at initial introduction and mixing. In stall-housed sows, TIS was significantly higher during late gestation. The TIS and cortisol concentration were significantly lower in stall-housed sows, compared with values for sows in pens. As parity increased, the likelihood of higher median TIS decreased significantly in pen-housed sows and increased significantly in stall-housed sows. The TIS of sows in pens was negatively correlated with body weight and backfat thickness, whereas these correlations were positive in stall-housed sows. Farrowing performance and results for novel arena or objects did not differ. Proportion of sows removed was significantly higher for pens than for stalls; lameness was the major reason for removal for both systems. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Stalls impose space restrictions for larger sows, resulting in injuries during late gestation. Interventions are needed to minimize aggression during initial introduction and mixing and at the ESF in pens to reduce severe injuries or lameness of gestating sows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261839     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  Effect of group size and structure on the welfare and performance of pregnant sows in pens with electronic sow feeders.

Authors:  Leena Anil; Sukumarannair S Anil; John Deen; Samuel K Baidoo; Roger D Walker
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Review: Early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs.

Authors:  A Prunier; X Averos; I Dimitrov; S A Edwards; E Hillmann; M Holinger; V Ilieski; R Leming; C Tallet; S P Turner; M Zupan; I Camerlink
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Effect of Different Feeding Systems on Salivary Cortisol Levels during Gestation in Sows on Herd Level.

Authors:  Ida Bahnsen; Kristina V Riddersholm; Leonardo V de Knegt; Thomas S Bruun; Charlotte Amdi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Risk Factors for Chronic Stress in Sows Housed in Groups, and Associated Risks of Prenatal Stress in Their Offspring.

Authors:  Martyna Ewa Lagoda; Joanna Marchewka; Keelin O'Driscoll; Laura Ann Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-12

5.  Prevalence of lameness and claw lesions during different stages in the reproductive cycle of sows and the impact on reproduction results.

Authors:  L M Pluym; A Van Nuffel; S Van Weyenberg; D Maes
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.