Literature DB >> 16639825

Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation.

Brian Wansink1.   

Abstract

It is the position of the American Dietetic Association (ADA) that food and nutrition misinformation can have harmful effects on the health, well-being, and economic status of consumers. Nationally credentialed dietetics professionals working in health care, academia, public health, the media, government, and the food industry are uniquely qualified to advocate for and promote science-based nutrition information to the public, function as primary nutrition educators to health professionals, and actively correct food and nutrition misinformation. Enormous scientific advances have been made in the area of food and nutrition, leading to a fine-tuning of recommendations about healthful eating. Consumers have become increasingly aware of the nutrition-health link and reliant on nutrition information to base their decisions, and have assumed partial responsibility for changing their eating behaviors. Unfortunately, these same trends also create opportunities for food and nutrition misinformation to flourish. News reports rarely provide enough context for consumers to interpret or apply the advice given, and preliminary findings often attract unmerited and misleading attention. Effective nutrition communication must be consumer-friendly and contain sufficient context to allow consumers to consider the information and determine whether it applies to their unique health and nutritional needs. Consistent with ADA's organizational vision that members "are the leading source of nutrition expertise," ADA recognizes its responsibility to help consumers identify food and nutrition misinformation in the following ways: (a) ADA members should provide consumers with sound, science-based nutrition information and help them to recognize misinformation; (b) ADA members need to be the primary source of sound, science-based nutrition information for the media and to inform them when misinformation is presented; and (c) ADA members should continue to diligently work with other health care practitioners, educators, policy makers, and food and dietary supplement industry representatives to responsibly address the health and psychological, physiological, and economic effects of nutrition-related misinformation.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16639825     DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  8 in total

1.  Nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes, and dietary behaviors among head start teachers in Texas: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shreela Sharma; Katherine Skala Dortch; Courtney Byrd-Williams; Jeanette B Truxillio; Gulshan A Rahman; Pamela Bonsu; Deanna Hoelscher
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Nutrition and Cancer Prevention: Why is the Evidence Lost in Translation?

Authors:  Katie M Di Sebastiano; Gayathri Murthy; Kristin L Campbell; Sophie Desroches; Rachel A Murphy
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Exploring dietitians' salient beliefs about shared decision-making behaviors.

Authors:  Sophie Desroches; Annie Lapointe; Sarah-Maude Deschênes; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; France Légaré
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  What drives athletes toward dietary supplement use: objective knowledge or self-perceived competence? Cross-sectional analysis of professional team-sport players from Southeastern Europe during the competitive season.

Authors:  Damir Sekulic; Enver Tahiraj; Dora Maric; Dragana Olujic; Antonino Bianco; Petra Zaletel
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Anti-Inflammatory Diets in Fertility: An Evidence Review.

Authors:  Simon Alesi; Anthony Villani; Evangeline Mantzioris; Wubet Worku Takele; Stephanie Cowan; Lisa J Moran; Aya Mousa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  #Healthpromotion: A qualitative exploration of how dietitians can use social media to positively influence women aged 18-35 years.

Authors:  Danielle Shine; Michelle Minehan; Cathy Knight-Agarwal
Journal:  Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Knowledge and perceptions about diet and physical activity among Sri Lankan adults with diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study.

Authors:  P Ranasinghe; A S A D Pigera; M H Ishara; L M D T Jayasekara; R Jayawardena; P Katulanda
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The health implications of distrust in the food system: findings from the dimensions of trust in food systems scale (DOTIFS scale).

Authors:  Emma Tonkin; Trevor Webb; Julie Henderson; Paul R Ward; John Coveney; Samantha B Meyer; Dean McCullum; Annabelle M Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.