David R Friedland1, Michelle A Michel. 1. Division of Otology and Neuro-otologic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. dfriedla@mcw.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To use morphometric analyses of cranial thickness to investigate 2 cases of unanticipated calvarial bone resorption in superior canal dehiscence (SCD) resurfacing surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective morphometric analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) temporal bone scans in normal and control subjects with accompanying case reports. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Two patients with SCD and failed resurfacing because of bone resorption. Temporal bone CT scans from 30 sex-matched controls. INTERVENTION: Resurfacing of SCD via a middle fossa approach using a split thickness calvarial graft from the craniotomy site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean cross-sectional area of the middle fossa craniotomy bone flap and mean cranial thickness at 30 and 45 degrees above the middle fossa floor. RESULTS: Two patients had delayed failure of SCD resurfacing surgery as manifested by return of symptoms. High-resolution CT scans in both, and intraoperative confirmation in one, confirmed resorption of the bone graft. Measurements of cross-sectional area of the middle fossa craniotomy on high-resolution CT scans demonstrated significantly reduced values in the two SCD patients as compared with normal controls (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05). Cranial thickness outside the squamous temporal bone was reduced but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Morphometric measurements of the calvarium have demonstrated that the squamous temporal bone is thinner in patients with SCD as compared with controls. Thus, the process leading to defects in the tegmen extends beyond the petrous pyramid. This suggests that there may be extratemporal factors leading to the development of a dehiscence. These findings also have implications for the surgical treatment of this disorder. Resurfacing methods may have a higher failure rate as the bone graft has reduced mass and maybe prone to resorption. Canal plugging methods may provide a more definitive means of addressing the dehiscent labyrinth than resurfacing.
OBJECTIVE: To use morphometric analyses of cranial thickness to investigate 2 cases of unanticipated calvarial bone resorption in superior canal dehiscence (SCD) resurfacing surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective morphometric analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) temporal bone scans in normal and control subjects with accompanying case reports. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Two patients with SCD and failed resurfacing because of bone resorption. Temporal bone CT scans from 30 sex-matched controls. INTERVENTION: Resurfacing of SCD via a middle fossa approach using a split thickness calvarial graft from the craniotomy site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean cross-sectional area of the middle fossa craniotomy bone flap and mean cranial thickness at 30 and 45 degrees above the middle fossa floor. RESULTS: Two patients had delayed failure of SCD resurfacing surgery as manifested by return of symptoms. High-resolution CT scans in both, and intraoperative confirmation in one, confirmed resorption of the bone graft. Measurements of cross-sectional area of the middle fossa craniotomy on high-resolution CT scans demonstrated significantly reduced values in the two SCDpatients as compared with normal controls (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05). Cranial thickness outside the squamous temporal bone was reduced but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Morphometric measurements of the calvarium have demonstrated that the squamous temporal bone is thinner in patients with SCD as compared with controls. Thus, the process leading to defects in the tegmen extends beyond the petrous pyramid. This suggests that there may be extratemporal factors leading to the development of a dehiscence. These findings also have implications for the surgical treatment of this disorder. Resurfacing methods may have a higher failure rate as the bone graft has reduced mass and maybe prone to resorption. Canal plugging methods may provide a more definitive means of addressing the dehiscent labyrinth than resurfacing.
Authors: Marko Spasic; Andy Trang; Lawrance K Chung; Nolan Ung; Kimberly Thill; Golmah Zarinkhou; Quinton S Gopen; Isaac Yang Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2015-05-29