Literature DB >> 16638861

A phase II trial of intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis.

Stephen M Hahn1, Douglas L Fraker, Rosemarie Mick, James Metz, Theresa M Busch, Debbie Smith, Timothy Zhu, Carmen Rodriguez, Andreea Dimofte, Francis Spitz, Mary Putt, Stephen C Rubin, Chandrakala Menon, Hsing-Wen Wang, Daniel Shin, Arjun Yodh, Eli Glatstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A previous phase I trial of i.p. photodynamic therapy established the maximally tolerated dose of Photofrin (Axcan Pharma, Birmingham, AL)-mediated photodynamic therapy and showed encouraging efficacy. The primary objectives of this phase II study were to determine the efficacy and toxicities of i.p. photodynamic therapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients received Photofrin 2.5 mg/kg i.v. 48 hours before debulking surgery. Intraoperative laser light was delivered to the peritoneal surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis. The outcomes of interest were (a) complete response, (b) failure-free survival time, and (c) overall survival time. Photosensitizer levels in tumor and normal tissues were measured.
RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled into one of three strata (33 ovarian, 37 gastrointestinal, and 30 sarcoma). Twenty-nine patients did not receive light treatment. All 100 patients had progressed by the time of statistical analysis. The median failure-free survival and overall survival by strata were ovarian, 2.1 and 20.1 months; gastrointestinal cancers, 1.8 and 11.1 months; sarcoma, 3.7 and 21.9 months. Substantial fluid shifts were observed postoperatively, and the major toxicities were related to volume overload. Two patients died in the immediate postoperative period from bleeding, sepsis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and cardiac ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy is feasible but does not lead to significant objective complete responses or long-term tumor control. Heterogeneity in photosensitizer uptake and tumor oxygenation, lack of tumor specificity for photosensitizer uptake, and the heterogeneity in tissue optical properties may account for the lack of efficacy observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16638861     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

Review 1.  Development and applications of photo-triggered theranostic agents.

Authors:  Prakash Rai; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Xiang Zheng; Ramtin Rahmanzadeh; Youssef Mir; Stefan Elrington; Ahmat Khurshid; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Quantitative imaging reveals heterogeneous growth dynamics and treatment-dependent residual tumor distributions in a three-dimensional ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Adnan O Abu-Yousif; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Optical Imaging, Photodynamic Therapy and Optically Triggered Combination Treatments.

Authors:  Srivalleesha Mallidi; Bryan Q Spring; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Analytic function for predicting light fluence rate of circular fields on a semi-infinite turbid medium.

Authors:  Yi Hong Ong; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted photosensitizer selectively inhibits EGFR signaling and induces targeted phototoxicity in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Adnan O Abu-Yousif; Anne C E Moor; Xiang Zheng; Mark D Savellano; Weiping Yu; Pål K Selbo; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update.

Authors:  Patrizia Agostinis; Kristian Berg; Keith A Cengel; Thomas H Foster; Albert W Girotti; Sandra O Gollnick; Stephen M Hahn; Michael R Hamblin; Asta Juzeniene; David Kessel; Mladen Korbelik; Johan Moan; Pawel Mroz; Dominika Nowis; Jacques Piette; Brian C Wilson; Jakub Golab
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Selective treatment and monitoring of disseminated cancer micrometastases in vivo using dual-function, activatable immunoconjugates.

Authors:  Bryan Q Spring; Adnan O Abu-Yousif; Akilan Palanisami; Imran Rizvi; Xiang Zheng; Zhiming Mai; Sriram Anbil; R Bryan Sears; Lawrence B Mensah; Ruth Goldschmidt; S Sibel Erdem; Esther Oliva; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  PDT dose parameters impact tumoricidal durability and cell death pathways in a 3D ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Imran Rizvi; Sriram Anbil; Nermina Alagic; Jonathan Celli; Jonathan P Celli; Lei Zak Zheng; Akilan Palanisami; Michael D Glidden; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  In vivo high-resolution fluorescence microendoscopy for ovarian cancer detection and treatment monitoring.

Authors:  W Zhong; J P Celli; I Rizvi; Z Mai; B Q Spring; S H Yun; T Hasan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.