Literature DB >> 16638784

Impact of adverse publicity on MMR vaccine uptake: a population based analysis of vaccine uptake records for one million children, born 1987-2004.

V Friederichs1, J C Cameron, C Robertson.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the impact of adverse publicity on MMR uptake and measles susceptibility, including whether vaccination is delayed and the role of deprivation.
METHODS: A population database for all Scotland containing immunisation records for over one million children (n = 1,079,327) born 1987-2004 was analysed. MMR uptake was determined by birth cohort and deprivation category. "Final" uptake (at approx age 6 years) was predicted by linear regression by birth cohort. Measles susceptibility in 1998 and 2003 was determined by postcode sector and district for cohorts combined to construct nursery and primary school age groups.
RESULTS: There is evidence of a slight rise in late uptake, but insufficient to compensate for underlying declines. Late vaccination continues to be associated with deprivation, while the most affluent tend to be vaccinated promptly, or not at all. Predicted figures for "final" MMR1 uptake are over 90%, but under 95%. Measles susceptibility has increased significantly in nursery children, with an eightfold rise in the number of districts with greater than 20% susceptibility in this group (from 3 to 25).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased measles susceptibility in nursery children is concerning, particularly in the most vulnerable areas. These figures are likely to increase in the future, as MMR uptake has not yet returned to the previous higher level. Increased susceptibility levels can also be expected in primary schools in the future, as levels of late uptake are insufficient to compensate. Predicted figures for "final" MMR1 uptake are under the herd immunity threshold and campaigns may be required to increase uptake among future primary school children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16638784      PMCID: PMC2082791          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.085944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  6 in total

1.  The elimination of indigenous measles transmission in England and Wales.

Authors:  Mary E Ramsay; Li Jin; Joanne White; Pam Litton; Bernard Cohen; David Brown
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Specialist vaccination advice and pockets of resistance to MMR vaccination: lessons from an outbreak of measles.

Authors:  O W Morgan; M Meltzer; D Muir; H Hogan; C Seng; J Hill; J Beckford
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  2003-12

3.  Factors influencing the uptake of childhood immunisation in rural areas.

Authors:  Rob Henderson; Ken Oates; Helen MacDonald; W Cairns S Smith; Sivasubramaniam Selvaraj
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Lone parent families are an independent risk factor for lower rates of childhood immunisation in London.

Authors:  M Sharland; P Atkinson; H Maguire; N Begg
Journal:  Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev       Date:  1997-10-17

5.  Do interventions that improve immunisation uptake also reduce social inequalities in uptake?

Authors:  R Reading; A Colver; S Openshaw; S Jarvis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-30

6.  Factors affecting uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation.

Authors:  J Li; B Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17
  6 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Childhood immunisation: what is the future?

Authors:  Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  MMR: where are we now?

Authors:  David Elliman; Helen Bedford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  MMR: marginalised, misrepresented and rejected? Autism: a focus group study.

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Factors associated with poor adherence to MMR vaccination in parents who follow vaccination schedule.

Authors:  Vincenzo Restivo; Giuseppe Napoli; Maria Grazia Laura Marsala; Valentina Bonanno; Valentina Sciuto; Emanuele Amodio; Giuseppe Calamusa; Francesco Vitale; Alberto Firenze
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Factors associated with uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and use of single antigen vaccines in a contemporary UK cohort: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Pearce; Catherine Law; David Elliman; Tim J Cole; Helen Bedford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-28

Review 6.  Interventions to reduce inequalities in vaccine uptake in children and adolescents aged <19 years: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Crocker-Buque; Michael Edelstein; Sandra Mounier-Jack
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Vaccination in England: a review of why business as usual is not enough to maintain coverage.

Authors:  Tim Crocker-Buque; Sandra Mounier-Jack
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Louis Torracinta; Rachel Tanner; Samantha Vanderslott
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-19

9.  "Publish or Perish"; time to question an age old adage?

Authors:  Darshana Sanghvi
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-23

10.  Characteristics of 5-year-olds who catch-up with MMR: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Anna Pearce; Miranda Mindlin; Mario Cortina-Borja; Helen Bedford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.