Literature DB >> 16638771

Postural, physiological and psychological reactions to challenging balance: does age make a difference?

Mark G Carpenter1, Allan L Adkin, Lawrence R Brawley, James S Frank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if increases in balance challenge influenced concomitant change in self-efficacy, state anxiety and physiological arousal, and if these changes were correlated with changes in standing balance in young and older adults.
DESIGN: A 2 x 2 between- (age) by within-subject (balance challenge) factorial design.
SETTING: quiet standing trials were performed on low and high support-surface heights in a research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: 14 Young (22-31 years) and 14 older (60-83 years) adults with no known neurological or balance disorders, or falls within the last year.
METHODS: Forceplate-derived measures of standing balance, measures of state anxiety, blood pressure and task-specific balance and coping self-efficacy.
RESULTS: Independent of age, mean position, amplitude and frequency of centre of pressure displacements were significantly influenced by surface height, as were anxiety and efficacy. Decreased amplitude and increased frequency changes observed in both age groups with increased balance challenge were consistent with a stiffening strategy. Blood pressure, state anxiety and self-efficacy were correlated with different postural control changes in young and older adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Older adults used the same stiffening strategy as young adults to cope with the increased anxiety and lowered confidence associated with standing on a high surface. Converging evidence indicates that physiological status, state anxiety and balance efficacy are related to specific changes in postural performance with increased balance challenge. Findings highlight the potential additive effects of psychological and physiological factors on clinical balance performance and the need to consider comprehensive rehabilitation and prevention techniques that concern psychological and physiological contributions to balance deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16638771     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  34 in total

1.  Arousal, valence and their relative effects on postural control.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of fear of falling on anticipatory postural control of medio-lateral stability during rapid leg flexion.

Authors:  E Yiou; T Deroche; M C Do; T Woodman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of postural control: effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; A Macerata; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Characteristics of older adults with self-reported stooping, crouching, or kneeling difficulty.

Authors:  Manuel E Hernandez; Susan L Murphy; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Neuromechanical tuning of nonlinear postural control dynamics.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Keith W van Antwerp; Jevin E Scrivens; J Lucas McKay; Torrence D J Welch; Jeffrey T Bingham; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 6.  Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: a framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture.

Authors:  Lena H Ting
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Golfers have better balance control and confidence than healthy controls.

Authors:  Kelly L Gao; Christina W Y Hui-Chan; William W N Tsang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Attentional requirements of postural control in people with spinal cord injury: the effect of dual task.

Authors:  C M Tse; M G Carpenter; T Liu-Ambrose; A E Chisholm; T Lam
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Alterations in the cortical control of standing posture during varying levels of postural threat and task difficulty.

Authors:  Craig D Tokuno; Martin Keller; Mark G Carpenter; Gonzalo Márquez; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Does risk-sensitivity transfer across movements?

Authors:  Megan K O'Brien; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.