Literature DB >> 16637896

Failing pregnancies of unknown location: a prospective evaluation of the human chorionic gonadotrophin ratio.

G Condous1, E Kirk, B Van Calster, S Van Huffel, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) ratio (hCG 48 hours/hCG 0 hour) to predict spontaneous resolution of pregnancies of unknown location (PUL).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Teaching Hospital Early Pregnancy Unit. POPULATION: Women classified as having a PUL.
METHODS: The optimal cutoff value for hCG ratio (serum hCG at 48 hours/serum hCG at 0 hours) was calculated from data on 189 consecutive PULs (the 'training set'). This cutoff was tested prospectively on a further 200 consecutive PULs (the 'test set'). The hCG ratio was also compared to absolute levels of serum hCG at 0 and 48 hour for the prediction of failing PULs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: hCG ratio in spontaneously resolving ('failing') PUL compared with those requiring intervention. Optimum cutoff determined and tested to predict spontaneously resolving PUL. Comparison of hCG ratio with absolute levels of serum hCG.
RESULTS: A total of 3996 consecutive women were scanned, of which 438 (11.0%) were classified as PULs. Complete data were available for 389 women: 189 in the training set and 200 in the test set. In the training set, there were 102 (54%) failing PUL, while 109 (55%) in the test set. hCG ratio of <0.87 predicted failing PUL, with a sensitivity of 93.1% (95% CI 85.9-97.0) and a specificity of 90.8% (95% CI 82.2-95.7) in the training set. In the test set, sensitivity was 92.7% (95% CI 85.6-96.5) and specificity was 96.7% (95% CI 90.0-99.1). The hCG ratio outperformed absolute serum hCG levels at 0 and 48 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: We have defined the optimal hCG ratio for the prediction of failing PUL. Using this cutoff, clinicians can safely adopt a noninterventional approach in women with PUL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16637896     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00924.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  10 in total

1.  The clinical performance of the M4 decision support model to triage women with a pregnancy of unknown location as at low or high risk of complications.

Authors:  S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Abnormal human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trends after transfer of multiple embryos resulting in viable singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Paula C Brady; Leslie V Farland; Stacey A Missmer; Catherine Racowsky; Janis H Fox
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Florin-Andrei Taran; Karl-Oliver Kagan; Markus Hübner; Markus Hoopmann; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  The term "pregnancy of unknown location" is here to stay.

Authors:  George Condous; Simon Winder; Shannon Reid
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 5.  Problems of modern approaches to management of early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Müberra Namlı Kalem; Ziya Kalem; Ebru Yüce; Ayla Eser; Zehra Candan İltemir Duvan
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 6.  Factors to consider in pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Shabnam Bobdiwala; Maya Al-Memar; Jessica Farren; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-29

7.  Pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Pedro Paulo Pereira; Fábio Roberto Cabar; Úrsula Trovato Gomez; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Triaging Women with Pregnancy of Unknown Location: Evaluation of Protocols Based on Single Serum Progesterone, Serum hCG Ratios, and Model M4.

Authors:  Rubina Izhar; Samia Husain; Muhammad Ahmad Tahir; Syed Hasan Ala; Rahila Imtiaz; Sonia Husain; Sara Talha
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

9.  Predictive analytical model for ectopic pregnancy diagnosis: Statistics vs. machine learning.

Authors:  Ploywarong Rueangket; Kristsanamon Rittiluechai; Akara Prayote
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-23

10.  Endometriosis and Beta-hCG > 775 IU/l Increase the Risk of Non-tube-preserving Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristin Nicolaus; Jorge Jimenez-Cruz; Dominik Michael Bräuer; Thomas Lehmann; Anke Regina Mothes; Ingo B Runnebaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.915

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.