BACKGROUND: Prospective studies have demonstrated a direct association between the baseline level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The potential for hsCRP variability during the follow-up interval is of great interest, so the repeatability of measurements of hsCRP in men and women, and in different age groups, was investigated in the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The measurement of hsCRP was performed in 899 male and 780 female Japanese civil servants aged 18-60 years in the spring of 2004 and 2005. Within-subject repeatability and intra-class correlation coefficient of reliability were used to characterize the variation in measurements. Error of the measurement process was negligible, as the analytical variance was 0.0003 [ln(mg/L)] [ln(mg/L)] with a reliability coefficient of 0.997. In contrast, the within-subject variation of hsCRP was considerable with a reliability coefficient of 0.61 in both sexes and repeatability coefficients of 5.25 and 5.38 in men and women, respectively. The variation differed with age, especially in women, as less variation was observed in subjects over 40 years of age during the follow-up interval. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a single measurement of hsCRP is subject to considerable but equal within-subject variation over time in men and women, and this variation differs among the age groups, which may affect the risk assessment of hsCRP in association with future cardiovascular events.
BACKGROUND: Prospective studies have demonstrated a direct association between the baseline level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The potential for hsCRP variability during the follow-up interval is of great interest, so the repeatability of measurements of hsCRP in men and women, and in different age groups, was investigated in the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The measurement of hsCRP was performed in 899 male and 780 female Japanese civil servants aged 18-60 years in the spring of 2004 and 2005. Within-subject repeatability and intra-class correlation coefficient of reliability were used to characterize the variation in measurements. Error of the measurement process was negligible, as the analytical variance was 0.0003 [ln(mg/L)] [ln(mg/L)] with a reliability coefficient of 0.997. In contrast, the within-subject variation of hsCRP was considerable with a reliability coefficient of 0.61 in both sexes and repeatability coefficients of 5.25 and 5.38 in men and women, respectively. The variation differed with age, especially in women, as less variation was observed in subjects over 40 years of age during the follow-up interval. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a single measurement of hsCRP is subject to considerable but equal within-subject variation over time in men and women, and this variation differs among the age groups, which may affect the risk assessment of hsCRP in association with future cardiovascular events.
Authors: Elizabeth A Platz; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Angelo M De Marzo; Charles G Drake; Nader Rifai; Ann W Hsing; Ashraful Hoque; Marian L Neuhouser; Phyllis J Goodman; Alan R Kristal Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Emil M DeGoma; Benjamin French; Richard L Dunbar; Matthew A Allison; Emile R Mohler; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Sandi L Navarro; Theodore M Brasky; Yvonne Schwarz; Xiaoling Song; C Y Wang; Alan R Kristal; Mario Kratz; Emily White; Johanna W Lampe Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Sheetal Hardikar; Xiaoling Song; Mario Kratz; Garnet L Anderson; Patricia L Blount; Brian J Reid; Thomas L Vaughan; Emily White Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jie Gao; Adrian McCann; Johnny Laupsa-Borge; Ottar Nygård; Per Magne Ueland; Klaus Meyer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Barbara Swanson; Joyce K Keithley; Angela Johnson; Louis Fogg; Oluwatoyin Adeyemi; Beverly E Sha; Kimberly A Snell Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Lina Tingö; Ashley N Hutchinson; Cecilia Bergh; Lena Stiefvatter; Anna Schweinlin; Morten G Jensen; Kirsten Krüger; Stephan C Bischoff; Robert J Brummer Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 6.706