Literature DB >> 16635220

Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?

Douglas K Rex.   

Abstract

In 2002, the U.S. MultiSociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer proposed multiple quality indicators for use in the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for colonoscopy. The quality indicators were not prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. This editorial reviews evidence suggesting that after cecal intubation rates, two quality indicators should be the priorities for the CQI process for colonoscopy: (1) measurement of individual endoscopists' adenoma detection rates and (2) recommended intervals for postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16635220     DOI： 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00483.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN： 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the EFFECT trial.

Authors:  G C Harewood; F Murray; S Winder; S Patchett
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Young-Kyu Park; Duck-Joo Lee; Kwang-Min Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Quality of colonoscopy reporting in community practice.

Authors:  Lena B Palmer; David H Abbott; Natia Hamilton; Dawn Provenzale; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?

Authors:  William A Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Patrick M Lynch; Asif Rashid; Mala Pande; Mehnaz A Shafi; Jeffrey H Lee; Gottumukkala S Raju
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database.

Authors:  Jason E Williams; Jennifer L Holub; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Characterization of forces applied by endoscopists during colonoscopy by using a wireless colonoscopy force monitor.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Vladimir Egorov; Sergey Tsuryupa; Brendan Corbin; Mary Anderson; Noune Sarvazyan; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates.

Authors:  Tarun Rai; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Tushar Gohel; Amareshwar Podugu; Prashanthi N Thota; Ravi P Kiran; Rocio Lopez; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2015-02-12

8.  Quality indicators in pediatric colonoscopy in a low-volume center: Implications for training.

Authors:  Way-Seah Lee; Chun-Wei Tee; Zhong-Lin Koay; Tat-Seng Wong; Fatimah Zahraq; Hee-Wei Foo; Sik-Yong Ong; Shin-Yee Wong; Ruey-Terng Ng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Association of Intensive Endoscopic Screening Burden With Gastric Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Choong-Kyun Noh; Eunyoung Lee; Gil Ho Lee; Joon Koo Kang; Sun Gyo Lim; Bumhee Park; Jae Bum Park; Sung Jae Shin; Jae Youn Cheong; Jin Hong Kim; Kee Myung Lee
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

10.  Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Vikram Vadyala; Rebecca Slack; Somashekar G Krishna; William A Ross; Patrick M Lynch; Robert S Bresalier; Ernest Hawk; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.452
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.