Literature DB >> 16634490

Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression.

Zakiah M Isa1, Galen B Schneider, Rebecca Zaharias, Denise Seabold, Clark M Stanford.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that fluoride-modified titanium surfaces would enhance osteoblast differentiation. Osteoblast growth on a moderately rough etched fluoride-modified titanium surface (alteration in cellular differentiation) was compared to osteoblast growth on the same surface grit-blasted with titanium dioxide. The potential role of nanometer-level alterations on cell shape and subsequent differentiation was then compared.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human embryonic palatal mesenchymal (HEPM) cultures were incubated on the respective surfaces for 1, 3, and 7 days, followed by analysis for cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) -specific activity, and mRNA steady-state expression for bone-related genes (ALP, type I collagen, osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein [BSP] II, Cbfa1, and osterix) by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
RESULTS: The different surfaces did not alter the mRNA expression for ALP, type I collagen, osterix, osteocalcin, or BSP II. However, Cbfa1 expression on the fluoride-modified titanium surface was significantly higher (P < .001) at 1 week. The number of cells on this surface was 20% lower than the number of cells on the surface TiO2-blasted with 25-microm particles but not significantly different from the number of cells on the surface TiO2-blasted with 125-microm particles. Cells grown on all the titanium surfaces expressed similar levels of ALP activity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that a fluoride-modified surface topography, in synergy with surface roughness, may have a greater influence on the level of expression of Cbfa1 (a key regulator for osteogenesis) than the unmodified titanium surfaces studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16634490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  16 in total

Review 1.  Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabio Variola; John B Brunski; Giovanna Orsini; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira; Rima Wazen; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Taylor McLachlan; Ye Cai; Sharon L Hyzy; Jennifer M Schneider; Zvi Schwartz; Kenneth H Sandhage; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Nanoscale hybrid implant surfaces and Osterix-mediated osseointegration.

Authors:  Laís Morandini Rodrigues; Elis A Lima Zutin; Elisa M Sartori; Fabio A P Rizzante; Daniela B S Mendonça; Paul H Krebsbach; Karl J Jepsen; Lyndon F Cooper; Luana M R Vasconcellos; Gustavo Mendonça
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.854

4.  Injectable chitosan microparticles incorporating bone morphogenetic protein-7 for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Venkata P Mantripragada; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330nm deep microgrooves.

Authors:  M J P Biggs; R G Richards; S McFarlane; C D W Wilkinson; R O C Oreffo; M J Dalby
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Nanoplex-Mediated Codelivery of Fibroblast Growth Factor and Bone Morphogenetic Protein Genes Promotes Osteogenesis in Human Adipocyte-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Keerthi Atluri; Denise Seabold; Liu Hong; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation.

Authors:  Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  In vitro osteogenic properties of two dental implant surfaces.

Authors:  Marta Monjo; Christiane Petzold; Joana Maria Ramis; Staale Petter Lyngstadaas; Jan Eirik Ellingsen
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-10-15

9.  Significance of nano- and microtopography for cell-surface interactions in orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  M Jäger; C Zilkens; K Zanger; R Krauspe
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Bioactive coatings for orthopaedic implants-recent trends in development of implant coatings.

Authors:  Bill G X Zhang; Damian E Myers; Gordon G Wallace; Milan Brandt; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.