Literature DB >> 34672417

Nanoscale hybrid implant surfaces and Osterix-mediated osseointegration.

Laís Morandini Rodrigues1, Elis A Lima Zutin1, Elisa M Sartori2, Fabio A P Rizzante3, Daniela B S Mendonça4, Paul H Krebsbach5, Karl J Jepsen6, Lyndon F Cooper7, Luana M R Vasconcellos1, Gustavo Mendonça4.   

Abstract

Endosseous implant surface topography directly affects adherent cell responses following implantation. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of nanoscale topographic modification of titanium implants on Osterix gene expression since this gene has been reported as key factor for bone formation. Titanium implants with smooth and nanoscale topographies were implanted in the femurs of Osterix-Cherry mice for 1-21 days. Implant integration was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate cell adhesion on implant surfaces, histology, and nanotomography (NanoCT) to observe and quantify the formed bone-to-implant interface, flow cytometry to quantify of Osterix expressing cells in adjacent tissues, and real-time PCR (qPCR) to quantify the osteoinductive and osteogenic gene expression of the implant-adherent cells. SEM revealed topography-dependent adhesion of cells at early timepoints. NanoCT demonstrated greater bone formation at nanoscale implants and interfacial osteogenesis was confirmed histologically at 7 and 14 days for both smooth and nanosurface implants. Flow cytometry revealed greater numbers of Osterix positive cells in femurs implanted with nanoscale versus smooth implants. Compared to smooth surface implants, nanoscale surface adherent cells expressed higher levels of Osterix (Osx), Alkaline phosphatase (Alp), Paired related homeobox (Prx1), Dentin matrix protein 1 (Dmp1), Bone sialoprotein (Bsp), and Osteocalcin (Ocn). In conclusion, nanoscale surface implants demonstrated greater bone formation associated with higher levels of Osterix expression over the 21-day healing period with direct evidence of surface-associated gene regulation involving a nanoscale-mediated osteoinductive pathway that utilizes Osterix to direct adherent cell osteoinduction.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone-implant interface; gene expression; nanostructured materials; osseointegration; surface topography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34672417      PMCID: PMC8805158          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.854


  43 in total

Review 1.  Flow cytometry of fluorescent proteins.

Authors:  William G Telford; Teresa Hawley; Fedor Subach; Vladislav Verkhusha; Robert G Hawley
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Effects of hierarchical micro/nano-topographies on the morphology, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Qianli Huang; Tarek A Elkhooly; Xujie Liu; Ranran Zhang; Xing Yang; Zhijian Shen; Qingling Feng
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.268

3.  Osteoblastic and cytokine gene expression of implant-adherent cells in humans.

Authors:  Matthew Bryington; Gustavo Mendonça; Salvador Nares; Lyndon F Cooper
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Bone stem cells.

Authors:  Jane E Aubin
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  Effects of the micro-nano surface topography of titanium alloy on the biological responses of osteoblast.

Authors:  Chengcheng Yin; Yanjing Zhang; Qing Cai; Baosheng Li; Hua Yang; Heling Wang; Hua Qi; Yanmin Zhou; Weiyan Meng
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo.

Authors:  Gustavo Mendonça; Daniela Baccelli Silveira Mendonça; Luis Gustavo Pagotto Simões; André Luiz Araújo; Edson Roberto Leite; Wagner Rodrigues Duarte; Lyndon F Cooper; Francisco J L Aragão
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Comparative molecular assessment of early osseointegration in implant-adherent cells.

Authors:  Ghadeer Thalji; Christina Gretzer; Lyndon F Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Juanli Guo; Ricardo J Padilla; Wallace Ambrose; Ingeborg J De Kok; Lyndon F Cooper
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Lutz Scheideler; Frank Rupp; Sharon L Hyzy; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation.

Authors:  Sabine A Eming; Paul Martin; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 17.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.