Literature DB >> 16633342

End stopping in V1 is sensitive to contrast.

Arash Yazdanbakhsh1, Margaret S Livingstone.   

Abstract

Common situations that result in different perceptions of grouping and border ownership, such as shadows and occlusion, have distinct sign-of-contrast relationships at their edge-crossing junctions. Here we report a property of end stopping in V1 that distinguishes among different sign-of-contrast situations, thereby obviating the need for explicit junction detectors. We show that the inhibitory effect of the end zones in end-stopped cells is highly selective for the relative sign of contrast between the central activating stimulus and stimuli presented at the end zones. Conversely, the facilitatory effect of end zones in length-summing cells is not selective for the relative sign of contrast between the central activating stimulus and stimuli presented at the end zones. This finding indicates that end stopping belongs in the category of cortical computations that are selective for sign of contrast, such as direction selectivity and disparity selectivity, but length summation does not.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633342      PMCID: PMC2645271          DOI: 10.1038/nn1693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  45 in total

1.  Two-dimensional substructure of MT receptive fields.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; C C Pack; R T Born
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  James R Cavanaugh; Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Substructure of direction-selective receptive fields in macaque V1.

Authors:  Margaret S Livingstone; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  End-stopping and the aperture problem: two-dimensional motion signals in macaque V1.

Authors:  Christopher C Pack; Margaret S Livingstone; Kevin R Duffy; Richard T Born
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Dimensions and properties of end-zone inhibitory areas in receptive fields of hypercomplex cells in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  G A Orban; H Kato; P O Bishop
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field.

Authors:  J I Nelson; B J Frost
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-01-13       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The contribution of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the length preference of hypercomplex cells in layers II and III of the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  A M Sillito; V Versiani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives on science and art.

Authors:  Bevil R Conway; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Terminator disparity contributes to stereo matching for eye movements and perception.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The responses of V1 cortical neurons to flashed presentations of orthogonal single lines and edges.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Nonuniform surround suppression of visual responses in mouse V1.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Berquin D Feese; Tai Sing Lee; Sandra J Kuhlman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Attention reshapes center-surround receptive field structure in macaque cortical area MT.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Valeska M Stephan; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Functional characterization of the extraclassical receptive field in macaque V1: contrast, orientation, and temporal dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher A Henry; Siddhartha Joshi; Dajun Xing; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  The neural basis of tactile motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Combining feature selection and integration--a neural model for MT motion selectivity.

Authors:  Cornelia Beck; Heiko Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Collinear search impairment is luminance contrast invariant.

Authors:  Chia-Huei Tseng; Hiu Mei Chow; Jiayu Liang; Satoshi Shioiri; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.