Literature DB >> 16633218

Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test.

Paolo Brusini1, Maria Letizia Salvetat, Marco Zeppieri, Lucia Parisi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test in detecting functional glaucomatous damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One eye in each of 60 healthy individuals, 108 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 150 patients with preperimetric (48) or perimetric (102) high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were considered. Visual fields were assessed by the standard automated perimetry (SAP) Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2, frequency doubling technology (FDT) N-30, and Humphrey Matrix 30-2 tests. Significantly abnormal points in the pattern deviation probability plot, testing time, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the FDT tests were evaluated.
RESULTS: FDT revealed a significantly greater percentage of depressed points than did SAP in OHT and preperimetric POAG eyes. The FDT-N-30 test showed a significantly greater percentage of areas with P < 5% in the OHT, preperimetric POAG, and early POAG groups. The Matrix-30-2 test provided an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve slightly lower than the FDT-N-30 test in the preperimetric POAG group, and significantly greater in the perimetric POAG group.
CONCLUSIONS: FDT perimetry appeared more sensitive than SAP in detecting early glaucomatous VF loss. The FDT-N-30 test showed a slightly higher ability to detect early glaucomatous damage in patients at risk for the development of glaucoma, whereas the Matrix-30-2 test provided a more detailed characterization of the glaucomatous VF loss pattern, although it required 30% more time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633218     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200604000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  [Importance of flicker contrast tests in functional glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  K Göbel; C M Poloschek; C Erb; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Interpretation of the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 test in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Jin A Choi; Na Young Lee; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Avni Patel; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; William D Dilworth; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].

Authors:  F Tonagel; B Voykov; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Detection of visual field defects in pre-perimetric glaucoma using fundus-oriented small-target perimetry.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakatani; Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Aiko Iwase; Kazutaka Kani; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Glaucoma diagnostic performance of humphrey matrix and standard automated perimetry.

Authors:  Yoon Pyo Nam; Seong Bae Park; Sung Yong Kang; Kyung Rim Sung; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry.

Authors:  Lyne Racette; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Diana Ng; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  False negative results in glaucoma detection with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II.

Authors:  Catherine Deghislage; Lidwine Van Malderen; Thierry G Zeyen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03

9.  Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  Raju Prema; Ronnie George; Arvind Hemamalini; Ramesh Sathyamangalam Ve; Mani Baskaran; Lingam Vijaya
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential in glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and control patients.

Authors:  Fabio N Kanadani; Paulo Aa Mello; Syril K Dorairaj; Tereza Cm Kanadani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.